2
Child Safety on Federated Social Media (purl.stanford.edu)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Not the best news in this report. We need to find ways to do more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

We do know they only found, what, 112 actual images of CP? That's a very small number. I'd say that paints us in a pretty good light, relatively.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    it says 112 instances of known CSAM. But that's based on their methodology, right, and their methodology is not actually looking at the content, it's looking at hashtags and whether google safesearch thinks it's explicit. Which Im pretty sure doesnt differentiate with what the subject of the explicitness is. It's just gonna try to detect breast or genitals I imagine.

    Though they do give a few damning examples of things like actual CP trading, but also that they've been removed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •