โฒ 720 โผ Germany decides against supporting chat control (www.patrick-breyer.de) submitted 10 months ago by PonyOfWar@pawb.social to c/europe@feddit.org 46 comments fedilink hide all child comments ...again. If it sounds familiar it's not just you. But they've been back on "undecided" shortly after. Let's hope this is the actual final decision.
[โ] PonyOfWar@pawb.social [S] 20 points 10 months ago (1 child) I guess ideally, we should put the right to encrypted communication into law or even into national constitutions. Unlikely to happen though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago (1 child) Finland already has it in constitution, though it's not about encryption but just right to privacy on private messaging. It was originally created to protect snail mail communication permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 3 points 10 months ago Germany has a similar paragraph but that means nothing if they again decide that surveillance is necessary permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago (1 child) Finland already has it in constitution, though it's not about encryption but just right to privacy on private messaging. It was originally created to protect snail mail communication permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 3 points 10 months ago Germany has a similar paragraph but that means nothing if they again decide that surveillance is necessary permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org 3 points 10 months ago Germany has a similar paragraph but that means nothing if they again decide that surveillance is necessary permalink fedilink source parent