▲ 383 ▼ So often true (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone) submitted 11 months ago by LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/witchesvspatriarchy@lemmy.ca 69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago* (1 child) Wow so tuff, this guy absolutely pulverized that strawman permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) The point is that unjustly accused people have the right to violent uphold their rights against persecution. If you accept false accusations as an eventuality, you accept violent retribution as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) Feel free to explain why correctly accused people wouldn't do the same thing. Also feel free to explain how due process only applies to other people because you're allowed to be violent if the law even thinks of responding to an accusation, false or otherwise, like it would for any other crime. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) It applies differently because reasonable people presume innocence and will therefore support those accised without evidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago* (1 child) LMAO Love the casual implication that women can't possibly be asking for that evidence to taken and treated seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) Not quite, in fact you just revealed your issue. I never stated that, youre making your own assumptions, and they are quite revealing. If they have any form of evidence, then they're not unjustly accusing. They're offered the same protections as a reasonable person, because they are. Unlike you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Okay buddy Redditor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago God I love self revealing assumptions. Keep em coming, id love to know more about you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (1 child) The point is that unjustly accused people have the right to violent uphold their rights against persecution. If you accept false accusations as an eventuality, you accept violent retribution as well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) Feel free to explain why correctly accused people wouldn't do the same thing. Also feel free to explain how due process only applies to other people because you're allowed to be violent if the law even thinks of responding to an accusation, false or otherwise, like it would for any other crime. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) It applies differently because reasonable people presume innocence and will therefore support those accised without evidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago* (1 child) LMAO Love the casual implication that women can't possibly be asking for that evidence to taken and treated seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) Not quite, in fact you just revealed your issue. I never stated that, youre making your own assumptions, and they are quite revealing. If they have any form of evidence, then they're not unjustly accusing. They're offered the same protections as a reasonable person, because they are. Unlike you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Okay buddy Redditor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago God I love self revealing assumptions. Keep em coming, id love to know more about you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child) Feel free to explain why correctly accused people wouldn't do the same thing. Also feel free to explain how due process only applies to other people because you're allowed to be violent if the law even thinks of responding to an accusation, false or otherwise, like it would for any other crime. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) It applies differently because reasonable people presume innocence and will therefore support those accised without evidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago* (1 child) LMAO Love the casual implication that women can't possibly be asking for that evidence to taken and treated seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) Not quite, in fact you just revealed your issue. I never stated that, youre making your own assumptions, and they are quite revealing. If they have any form of evidence, then they're not unjustly accusing. They're offered the same protections as a reasonable person, because they are. Unlike you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Okay buddy Redditor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago God I love self revealing assumptions. Keep em coming, id love to know more about you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) It applies differently because reasonable people presume innocence and will therefore support those accised without evidence. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago* (1 child) LMAO Love the casual implication that women can't possibly be asking for that evidence to taken and treated seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) Not quite, in fact you just revealed your issue. I never stated that, youre making your own assumptions, and they are quite revealing. If they have any form of evidence, then they're not unjustly accusing. They're offered the same protections as a reasonable person, because they are. Unlike you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Okay buddy Redditor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago God I love self revealing assumptions. Keep em coming, id love to know more about you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago* (1 child) LMAO Love the casual implication that women can't possibly be asking for that evidence to taken and treated seriously. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) Not quite, in fact you just revealed your issue. I never stated that, youre making your own assumptions, and they are quite revealing. If they have any form of evidence, then they're not unjustly accusing. They're offered the same protections as a reasonable person, because they are. Unlike you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Okay buddy Redditor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago God I love self revealing assumptions. Keep em coming, id love to know more about you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago (1 child) Not quite, in fact you just revealed your issue. I never stated that, youre making your own assumptions, and they are quite revealing. If they have any form of evidence, then they're not unjustly accusing. They're offered the same protections as a reasonable person, because they are. Unlike you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Okay buddy Redditor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago God I love self revealing assumptions. Keep em coming, id love to know more about you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 child) Okay buddy Redditor permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago God I love self revealing assumptions. Keep em coming, id love to know more about you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 1 point 11 months ago God I love self revealing assumptions. Keep em coming, id love to know more about you. permalink fedilink source parent