you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] -5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    You understand it actually is pronounced jif right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I dunno about that, but seems like a lot of people aren't aware of the intended pronunciation.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/22/tech/web/pronounce-gif

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    and the beautiful thing is, language does not work that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not sure what you mean. Are you some sort of cunning linguist?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    a sort. you can intend people to use a word you made up or pronounce it a certain way, but how it's used or pronounced is how it's going to be in the language regardless of its creator's intent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Language is not completely a democratic process. A 30:70 split on pronunciation doesn't indicate that one version is going to fade into oblivion. Pronunciation can evolve but so can definition. The word "literally" no longer means what it used to mean in common vernacular. Not everyone should be expected to accept these majority trends though. Many of us still want "literally" to preserve its original definition for example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago

    The letter 's' was added to "Island" as a stylistic choice in order to make a word that has no Latin root appear more Latin. Do you go around telling people "the intended spelling is eyland"?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    The fact that you had to spell it wrong to communicate the "proper" pronouciation is not a good sign for your argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    There is a whole famous book where words are spelled funny so that people understand how to pronounce them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    So we agree "jif" is not an intuitive pronouciation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    No. It's ambiguous, hence the confusion. Just today actually I had a German guy asking me about GHAR-EE-man-dering actually!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    "Someone else intuitively used a hard 'g' for a different word" is not the argument you think it is.

    Did you understand what they were asking about?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    They were trying to ask about gerrymandering. It's a hot topic in American politics right now, but it's something that has been used similarly in other places as well so it's worth being familiar with.

    I sorry if you like hard Gs better. When you invent a technology and acronym for it and publically write and announce how it's pronounced, I promise I'll respect that too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    They were trying to ask about gerrymandering

    I know. I understood what they were trying to ask clearly from the phonetics they used. Did you?

    My point here is what do you think the purpose of language is?
    Is the purpose of language for people to "own" words and they can dictate how they are used?
    Is the purpose to gatekeep communication and stop conversations if the language is not used "properly" or "as intended"?
    Or is the purpose to communicate ideas, and as long as the idea is communicated efficiently the purpose of language has been served even if the usage is slightly different?

    Aluminum has two very different common pronunciations and I understand both just fine. I don't feel the need to tell people "actually it's pronounced aluminum."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Sure. But context matters right? I also wouldn't correct someone if they said sontimeters instead of cenimeters, but if it was a specific conversation explicitly about how to say centimeters, I might chime in with an opinion and some historical facts right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments