you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

No, he won with a plurality of voters, not over half of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Every time this topic comes up one of you guys shows up to make minor statistical and grammatical corrections about the voting population like it makes any damned bit of difference to our lived experience. America elected this piece of shit twice and that is the only important part of the discussion. The rest is just you hoping to convince yourself that things aren't as bad as they seem. Well, they are that bad so please focus on something more useful than using statistically precise language to describe how many tens of millions of our neighbors support this child raping charlatan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    They're indeed bad - REALLY bad - but overstating Trump's support isn't helpful. 77 million out of roughly 174 million eligible voters, or about 44%, chose fascism, NOT a majority.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    That distinction is irrelevant in just about every conceivable way. No one rational should be comforted by the clarification that only 77 million of their neighbors are fascists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    REALLY bad

    I'm not sure where you got "comforted" from this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    What then is your intent when insisting on making the distinction between a majority of voters and a plurality of voters? It appears to me to be an attempt at making this seem like less of a problem than it is, especially when the plurality is as close to the same number as a majority is in this case.

  • source
  • parent