you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 108 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

I can buy a book and cross out words with a sharpie if I want. I can't go make copies of my edited book and distribute them, but I can do what I want with my copy that I legally acquired.

An ad blocker just edits the local copy. It's not re-publishing the site without ads.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I wonder if someone set up a Language Model that just regurgitated the information in its own words without the ads (like LLMs do) how sites would be able to complain about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yeah LLMs are actually a tricky copy-right problem and they seem to be getting a free pass.

    Ad blockers don't seem to be tricky.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    they seem to be getting a free pass

    Because the legal system is a war of attrition in who can pay the lawyers the longest. The traditional media knows they'll lose that ware against the tech magnates. They also know they'll win against the browser addon developer.

  • source
  • parent
  • It's because the billionaires are the ones controlling the businesses of generative AI.

    Adblockers are benefitting the middle class and the poors at the expense of billionaires, so they can't stay.

    It's literally that simple, unfortunately.

  • source
  • parent