426
Wikipedia loses UK Safety Act challenge, worries it will have to verify user IDs (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

I’m sure you read it pretty regularly

I've found it less and less capable of keeping up with current events. Enshittification truly comes for us all.

It’s easy to focus on the negatives and miss what an absolute treasure it still is.

As a historical artifact and a demonstration of the potential for open-sourced editing, it's a milestone. But we're clearly in the twilight of the Wikipedia era.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It’s never really been all that great about current events. That’s the cost of being “neutral” and letting everything settle into hindsight. However the vast majority of human knowledge isn’t current events. Even if Wikipedia were to never get updated again it is still extremely useful.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    However the vast majority of human knowledge isn’t current events.

    Broadly speaking, everything was a current event at some point. As Wikipedia calcifies, it loses the ability to capture and collate new information as it is produced.

    Even if Wikipedia were to never get updated again it is still extremely useful.

    In the same way as any dated encyclopedia, sure. I've got a copy of my dad's childhood encyclopedia, dated to 1954. Lots of interesting factoids in there, assuming your interest in the world is satisfied by an English speaking editor's ability to consolidate the information available to his firm at their publishing deadline.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent