▲ 115 ▼ The balance of security and privacy sounds weird when privacy IS security. (lemmy.ca) submitted 1 year ago by opi@lemmy.ca to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world 15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) So is getting molested. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] poccalyps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago And there’s the tension, perfectly captured by the last two replies. And it is extensible to anarchy vs authoritarianism. Because we are a species unable of setting individual wants below societal needs without a prevailing existential threat (starvation, disease, war, etc.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) So is getting molested. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] poccalyps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago And there’s the tension, perfectly captured by the last two replies. And it is extensible to anarchy vs authoritarianism. Because we are a species unable of setting individual wants below societal needs without a prevailing existential threat (starvation, disease, war, etc.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] poccalyps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago And there’s the tension, perfectly captured by the last two replies. And it is extensible to anarchy vs authoritarianism. Because we are a species unable of setting individual wants below societal needs without a prevailing existential threat (starvation, disease, war, etc.) permalink fedilink source parent