you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This reminds me of a discussion I was having with Hexbear members on Lemmy recently.

I was suggesting that perhaps it makes sense for the UK to have nukes, for self-defence against other nuclear countries like Russia, China, and potentially even the US, given their unpredictable behaviour. People from Hexbear got angry at this suggestion. One of them suggested that it's immoral to have nukes because nukes are "threatening civilians".

Maybe the OP image of this thread is right though: megalomaniacs are not deterred by words, but they are deterred by weapons (such as nukes). Ukraine was invaded because they didn't have enough deterrents. Iran is currently being bombed because I suppose they also didn't have enough deterrents.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Ukraine actually gave their nukes on the promise of future safety. We all saw how that worked out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Exactly. If Ukraine had their own nukes by the time of 2014, or if they had been part of NATO, then maybe Russia wouldn't have invaded Ukraine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    "More nukes" is never a good solution to any problem

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I think ideally there would be no nukes in the world, because they are dangerous. But nukes do exist. If western countries got rid of their nukes, then the remaining nuclear countries would be able to do what they like. "Surrender to our demands or we will nuke your cities."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You'd think so, but it worked out surprisingly well during the cold war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    The war that was caused by nuclear arsenals and ended with treaties to get rid of them? The fuck

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    The only reason it stayed cold the whole time is that both sides had nukes. Even the most adamant of chicken hawks hesitated to pull the trigger with the consequence of the world becoming uninhabitable hanging over our heads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments