▲ 928 ▼ Bringing a "please don't" to a gun fight (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by Squorlple@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 191 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) Exactly. If Ukraine had their own nukes by the time of 2014, or if they had been part of NATO, then maybe Russia wouldn't have invaded Ukraine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 year ago (4 children) "More nukes" is never a good solution to any problem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago I think ideally there would be no nukes in the world, because they are dangerous. But nukes do exist. If western countries got rid of their nukes, then the remaining nuclear countries would be able to do what they like. "Surrender to our demands or we will nuke your cities." permalink fedilink source parent [–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Perhaps not a good one, but still a solution, when a bear gets overly familiar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Bear Beets Battlestar Galactica permalink fedilink source parent [–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) what if your nuclear weapon collection is looking too small? How, other than getting more nukes, does on remedy this problem? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago North Korea is a good example of a small collection of Nukes being an effective detterant. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You'd think so, but it worked out surprisingly well during the cold war. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The war that was caused by nuclear arsenals and ended with treaties to get rid of them? The fuck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The only reason it stayed cold the whole time is that both sides had nukes. Even the most adamant of chicken hawks hesitated to pull the trigger with the consequence of the world becoming uninhabitable hanging over our heads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that MAD is not a thing, I'm just saying it's a stupid thing. And that the cold war ended when both parties eventually realized that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The cold war ended when the Soviet Union ran out of money. And frankly, there are still people trying to keep it going. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 year ago (4 children) "More nukes" is never a good solution to any problem permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago I think ideally there would be no nukes in the world, because they are dangerous. But nukes do exist. If western countries got rid of their nukes, then the remaining nuclear countries would be able to do what they like. "Surrender to our demands or we will nuke your cities." permalink fedilink source parent [–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Perhaps not a good one, but still a solution, when a bear gets overly familiar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Bear Beets Battlestar Galactica permalink fedilink source parent [–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) what if your nuclear weapon collection is looking too small? How, other than getting more nukes, does on remedy this problem? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago North Korea is a good example of a small collection of Nukes being an effective detterant. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You'd think so, but it worked out surprisingly well during the cold war. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The war that was caused by nuclear arsenals and ended with treaties to get rid of them? The fuck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The only reason it stayed cold the whole time is that both sides had nukes. Even the most adamant of chicken hawks hesitated to pull the trigger with the consequence of the world becoming uninhabitable hanging over our heads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that MAD is not a thing, I'm just saying it's a stupid thing. And that the cold war ended when both parties eventually realized that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The cold war ended when the Soviet Union ran out of money. And frankly, there are still people trying to keep it going. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago I think ideally there would be no nukes in the world, because they are dangerous. But nukes do exist. If western countries got rid of their nukes, then the remaining nuclear countries would be able to do what they like. "Surrender to our demands or we will nuke your cities." permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Perhaps not a good one, but still a solution, when a bear gets overly familiar. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Bear Beets Battlestar Galactica permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Bear Beets Battlestar Galactica permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) what if your nuclear weapon collection is looking too small? How, other than getting more nukes, does on remedy this problem? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago North Korea is a good example of a small collection of Nukes being an effective detterant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago North Korea is a good example of a small collection of Nukes being an effective detterant. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You'd think so, but it worked out surprisingly well during the cold war. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The war that was caused by nuclear arsenals and ended with treaties to get rid of them? The fuck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The only reason it stayed cold the whole time is that both sides had nukes. Even the most adamant of chicken hawks hesitated to pull the trigger with the consequence of the world becoming uninhabitable hanging over our heads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that MAD is not a thing, I'm just saying it's a stupid thing. And that the cold war ended when both parties eventually realized that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The cold war ended when the Soviet Union ran out of money. And frankly, there are still people trying to keep it going. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The war that was caused by nuclear arsenals and ended with treaties to get rid of them? The fuck permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The only reason it stayed cold the whole time is that both sides had nukes. Even the most adamant of chicken hawks hesitated to pull the trigger with the consequence of the world becoming uninhabitable hanging over our heads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that MAD is not a thing, I'm just saying it's a stupid thing. And that the cold war ended when both parties eventually realized that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The cold war ended when the Soviet Union ran out of money. And frankly, there are still people trying to keep it going. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The only reason it stayed cold the whole time is that both sides had nukes. Even the most adamant of chicken hawks hesitated to pull the trigger with the consequence of the world becoming uninhabitable hanging over our heads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that MAD is not a thing, I'm just saying it's a stupid thing. And that the cold war ended when both parties eventually realized that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The cold war ended when the Soviet Union ran out of money. And frankly, there are still people trying to keep it going. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'm not saying that MAD is not a thing, I'm just saying it's a stupid thing. And that the cold war ended when both parties eventually realized that permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The cold war ended when the Soviet Union ran out of money. And frankly, there are still people trying to keep it going. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago The cold war ended when the Soviet Union ran out of money. And frankly, there are still people trying to keep it going. permalink fedilink source parent