▲ 90 ▼ Home cooking (slrpnk.net) submitted 1 year ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 80 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] simsalabim@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) I mean if the other partner goes to work and the other is at home, it's fair to expect the stay at home one to take on the burden of most housework imo. Full day of work and then your partner gives you shit about not cooking your own food? Fucking hell permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where do you see it stated that she doesn't work? Maybe that's the best she can manage after a long day of work herself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago Where did you see that she does work? We're all going on supposition here. She doesn't work, fair to expect housework. She also works, fair to expect sharing the housework imo permalink fedilink source parent [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Maybe she goes into work earlier than he does, maybe she works from home, maybe she does shift work. There is nothing "baked in" to this scenario. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, your bias leans towards this. Careful, your misogyny is showing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't state the information either way. She may or may not work. Insisting that she doesn't is YOU (and the original person I replied to) adding information. I accept that both options are possible. Can you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Agnostocism? 😂 If you were truly agnostic, you wouldn't have started pushing your view. As for logic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don't need to prove she definitely is working, that's not how logic works. It's sufficient that I can provide even one reasonable scenario under which she could be home earlier than him but still work full time, to disprove the statement that she doesn't work. So here you go: maybe she works from home, so she cooked because she didn't have to commute. I get it - you interpret this scenario as evidence of her being lazy and/or incompetent. You want to buy into that, for whatever personal reasons of your own, so you ignore the facts: The picture is misleading - the chicken is cooked, that colour is a sauce. You can tell if you look closely to the right of the chicken, and to the area below the chicken where the sauce comes onto the vegetables. So not only did she cook him chicken, she even made him a sauce with it. The scenario is similarly presented in a misleading way to evoke an emotional reaction from the reader. a) You only know about his coming home from work because that is what he chose to tell you. He wants you to identify with him, to remember that exhausted feeling after a hard day of work. b) You know nothing about her circumstances. That allows the reader to inject their personal bias into the scenario, which you can see from the varied responses to the post. Your bias is toward a traditional provider/home maker relationship, which is why in your opinion such an opinion is "baked in" to the scenario. I don't have that bias because I know too many women who work and still do the majority of the household work. My experience is not the exception - there is a tremendous amount of research on this topic. We are a generation of young women who were told we could do anything and instead heard that we had to be everything. Courtney E. Martin So, maybe she works. Maybe she doesn't work outside the home but recently gave birth to twins and hasn't slept properly in weeks. Maybe she has a chronic illness that makes cooking difficult. Maybe she was never taught how to cook and is trying really hard to teach herself. Maybe that meal tastes amazing. All I'm asking is that you see her as a human who maybe had a tough day too. To think critically and not just allow your emotions to be manipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) I mean if the other partner goes to work and the other is at home, it's fair to expect the stay at home one to take on the burden of most housework imo. Full day of work and then your partner gives you shit about not cooking your own food? Fucking hell permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where do you see it stated that she doesn't work? Maybe that's the best she can manage after a long day of work herself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago Where did you see that she does work? We're all going on supposition here. She doesn't work, fair to expect housework. She also works, fair to expect sharing the housework imo permalink fedilink source parent [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Maybe she goes into work earlier than he does, maybe she works from home, maybe she does shift work. There is nothing "baked in" to this scenario. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, your bias leans towards this. Careful, your misogyny is showing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't state the information either way. She may or may not work. Insisting that she doesn't is YOU (and the original person I replied to) adding information. I accept that both options are possible. Can you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Agnostocism? 😂 If you were truly agnostic, you wouldn't have started pushing your view. As for logic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don't need to prove she definitely is working, that's not how logic works. It's sufficient that I can provide even one reasonable scenario under which she could be home earlier than him but still work full time, to disprove the statement that she doesn't work. So here you go: maybe she works from home, so she cooked because she didn't have to commute. I get it - you interpret this scenario as evidence of her being lazy and/or incompetent. You want to buy into that, for whatever personal reasons of your own, so you ignore the facts: The picture is misleading - the chicken is cooked, that colour is a sauce. You can tell if you look closely to the right of the chicken, and to the area below the chicken where the sauce comes onto the vegetables. So not only did she cook him chicken, she even made him a sauce with it. The scenario is similarly presented in a misleading way to evoke an emotional reaction from the reader. a) You only know about his coming home from work because that is what he chose to tell you. He wants you to identify with him, to remember that exhausted feeling after a hard day of work. b) You know nothing about her circumstances. That allows the reader to inject their personal bias into the scenario, which you can see from the varied responses to the post. Your bias is toward a traditional provider/home maker relationship, which is why in your opinion such an opinion is "baked in" to the scenario. I don't have that bias because I know too many women who work and still do the majority of the household work. My experience is not the exception - there is a tremendous amount of research on this topic. We are a generation of young women who were told we could do anything and instead heard that we had to be everything. Courtney E. Martin So, maybe she works. Maybe she doesn't work outside the home but recently gave birth to twins and hasn't slept properly in weeks. Maybe she has a chronic illness that makes cooking difficult. Maybe she was never taught how to cook and is trying really hard to teach herself. Maybe that meal tastes amazing. All I'm asking is that you see her as a human who maybe had a tough day too. To think critically and not just allow your emotions to be manipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Distractor@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Where do you see it stated that she doesn't work? Maybe that's the best she can manage after a long day of work herself permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago Where did you see that she does work? We're all going on supposition here. She doesn't work, fair to expect housework. She also works, fair to expect sharing the housework imo permalink fedilink source parent [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Maybe she goes into work earlier than he does, maybe she works from home, maybe she does shift work. There is nothing "baked in" to this scenario. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, your bias leans towards this. Careful, your misogyny is showing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't state the information either way. She may or may not work. Insisting that she doesn't is YOU (and the original person I replied to) adding information. I accept that both options are possible. Can you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Agnostocism? 😂 If you were truly agnostic, you wouldn't have started pushing your view. As for logic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don't need to prove she definitely is working, that's not how logic works. It's sufficient that I can provide even one reasonable scenario under which she could be home earlier than him but still work full time, to disprove the statement that she doesn't work. So here you go: maybe she works from home, so she cooked because she didn't have to commute. I get it - you interpret this scenario as evidence of her being lazy and/or incompetent. You want to buy into that, for whatever personal reasons of your own, so you ignore the facts: The picture is misleading - the chicken is cooked, that colour is a sauce. You can tell if you look closely to the right of the chicken, and to the area below the chicken where the sauce comes onto the vegetables. So not only did she cook him chicken, she even made him a sauce with it. The scenario is similarly presented in a misleading way to evoke an emotional reaction from the reader. a) You only know about his coming home from work because that is what he chose to tell you. He wants you to identify with him, to remember that exhausted feeling after a hard day of work. b) You know nothing about her circumstances. That allows the reader to inject their personal bias into the scenario, which you can see from the varied responses to the post. Your bias is toward a traditional provider/home maker relationship, which is why in your opinion such an opinion is "baked in" to the scenario. I don't have that bias because I know too many women who work and still do the majority of the household work. My experience is not the exception - there is a tremendous amount of research on this topic. We are a generation of young women who were told we could do anything and instead heard that we had to be everything. Courtney E. Martin So, maybe she works. Maybe she doesn't work outside the home but recently gave birth to twins and hasn't slept properly in weeks. Maybe she has a chronic illness that makes cooking difficult. Maybe she was never taught how to cook and is trying really hard to teach herself. Maybe that meal tastes amazing. All I'm asking is that you see her as a human who maybe had a tough day too. To think critically and not just allow your emotions to be manipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago Where did you see that she does work? We're all going on supposition here. She doesn't work, fair to expect housework. She also works, fair to expect sharing the housework imo permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Maybe she goes into work earlier than he does, maybe she works from home, maybe she does shift work. There is nothing "baked in" to this scenario. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, your bias leans towards this. Careful, your misogyny is showing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't state the information either way. She may or may not work. Insisting that she doesn't is YOU (and the original person I replied to) adding information. I accept that both options are possible. Can you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Agnostocism? 😂 If you were truly agnostic, you wouldn't have started pushing your view. As for logic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don't need to prove she definitely is working, that's not how logic works. It's sufficient that I can provide even one reasonable scenario under which she could be home earlier than him but still work full time, to disprove the statement that she doesn't work. So here you go: maybe she works from home, so she cooked because she didn't have to commute. I get it - you interpret this scenario as evidence of her being lazy and/or incompetent. You want to buy into that, for whatever personal reasons of your own, so you ignore the facts: The picture is misleading - the chicken is cooked, that colour is a sauce. You can tell if you look closely to the right of the chicken, and to the area below the chicken where the sauce comes onto the vegetables. So not only did she cook him chicken, she even made him a sauce with it. The scenario is similarly presented in a misleading way to evoke an emotional reaction from the reader. a) You only know about his coming home from work because that is what he chose to tell you. He wants you to identify with him, to remember that exhausted feeling after a hard day of work. b) You know nothing about her circumstances. That allows the reader to inject their personal bias into the scenario, which you can see from the varied responses to the post. Your bias is toward a traditional provider/home maker relationship, which is why in your opinion such an opinion is "baked in" to the scenario. I don't have that bias because I know too many women who work and still do the majority of the household work. My experience is not the exception - there is a tremendous amount of research on this topic. We are a generation of young women who were told we could do anything and instead heard that we had to be everything. Courtney E. Martin So, maybe she works. Maybe she doesn't work outside the home but recently gave birth to twins and hasn't slept properly in weeks. Maybe she has a chronic illness that makes cooking difficult. Maybe she was never taught how to cook and is trying really hard to teach herself. Maybe that meal tastes amazing. All I'm asking is that you see her as a human who maybe had a tough day too. To think critically and not just allow your emotions to be manipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Distractor@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Maybe she goes into work earlier than he does, maybe she works from home, maybe she does shift work. There is nothing "baked in" to this scenario. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, your bias leans towards this. Careful, your misogyny is showing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't state the information either way. She may or may not work. Insisting that she doesn't is YOU (and the original person I replied to) adding information. I accept that both options are possible. Can you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Agnostocism? 😂 If you were truly agnostic, you wouldn't have started pushing your view. As for logic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don't need to prove she definitely is working, that's not how logic works. It's sufficient that I can provide even one reasonable scenario under which she could be home earlier than him but still work full time, to disprove the statement that she doesn't work. So here you go: maybe she works from home, so she cooked because she didn't have to commute. I get it - you interpret this scenario as evidence of her being lazy and/or incompetent. You want to buy into that, for whatever personal reasons of your own, so you ignore the facts: The picture is misleading - the chicken is cooked, that colour is a sauce. You can tell if you look closely to the right of the chicken, and to the area below the chicken where the sauce comes onto the vegetables. So not only did she cook him chicken, she even made him a sauce with it. The scenario is similarly presented in a misleading way to evoke an emotional reaction from the reader. a) You only know about his coming home from work because that is what he chose to tell you. He wants you to identify with him, to remember that exhausted feeling after a hard day of work. b) You know nothing about her circumstances. That allows the reader to inject their personal bias into the scenario, which you can see from the varied responses to the post. Your bias is toward a traditional provider/home maker relationship, which is why in your opinion such an opinion is "baked in" to the scenario. I don't have that bias because I know too many women who work and still do the majority of the household work. My experience is not the exception - there is a tremendous amount of research on this topic. We are a generation of young women who were told we could do anything and instead heard that we had to be everything. Courtney E. Martin So, maybe she works. Maybe she doesn't work outside the home but recently gave birth to twins and hasn't slept properly in weeks. Maybe she has a chronic illness that makes cooking difficult. Maybe she was never taught how to cook and is trying really hard to teach herself. Maybe that meal tastes amazing. All I'm asking is that you see her as a human who maybe had a tough day too. To think critically and not just allow your emotions to be manipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, your bias leans towards this. Careful, your misogyny is showing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't state the information either way. She may or may not work. Insisting that she doesn't is YOU (and the original person I replied to) adding information. I accept that both options are possible. Can you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Agnostocism? 😂 If you were truly agnostic, you wouldn't have started pushing your view. As for logic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don't need to prove she definitely is working, that's not how logic works. It's sufficient that I can provide even one reasonable scenario under which she could be home earlier than him but still work full time, to disprove the statement that she doesn't work. So here you go: maybe she works from home, so she cooked because she didn't have to commute. I get it - you interpret this scenario as evidence of her being lazy and/or incompetent. You want to buy into that, for whatever personal reasons of your own, so you ignore the facts: The picture is misleading - the chicken is cooked, that colour is a sauce. You can tell if you look closely to the right of the chicken, and to the area below the chicken where the sauce comes onto the vegetables. So not only did she cook him chicken, she even made him a sauce with it. The scenario is similarly presented in a misleading way to evoke an emotional reaction from the reader. a) You only know about his coming home from work because that is what he chose to tell you. He wants you to identify with him, to remember that exhausted feeling after a hard day of work. b) You know nothing about her circumstances. That allows the reader to inject their personal bias into the scenario, which you can see from the varied responses to the post. Your bias is toward a traditional provider/home maker relationship, which is why in your opinion such an opinion is "baked in" to the scenario. I don't have that bias because I know too many women who work and still do the majority of the household work. My experience is not the exception - there is a tremendous amount of research on this topic. We are a generation of young women who were told we could do anything and instead heard that we had to be everything. Courtney E. Martin So, maybe she works. Maybe she doesn't work outside the home but recently gave birth to twins and hasn't slept properly in weeks. Maybe she has a chronic illness that makes cooking difficult. Maybe she was never taught how to cook and is trying really hard to teach herself. Maybe that meal tastes amazing. All I'm asking is that you see her as a human who maybe had a tough day too. To think critically and not just allow your emotions to be manipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, your bias leans towards this. Careful, your misogyny is showing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't state the information either way. She may or may not work. Insisting that she doesn't is YOU (and the original person I replied to) adding information. I accept that both options are possible. Can you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Agnostocism? 😂 If you were truly agnostic, you wouldn't have started pushing your view. As for logic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don't need to prove she definitely is working, that's not how logic works. It's sufficient that I can provide even one reasonable scenario under which she could be home earlier than him but still work full time, to disprove the statement that she doesn't work. So here you go: maybe she works from home, so she cooked because she didn't have to commute. I get it - you interpret this scenario as evidence of her being lazy and/or incompetent. You want to buy into that, for whatever personal reasons of your own, so you ignore the facts: The picture is misleading - the chicken is cooked, that colour is a sauce. You can tell if you look closely to the right of the chicken, and to the area below the chicken where the sauce comes onto the vegetables. So not only did she cook him chicken, she even made him a sauce with it. The scenario is similarly presented in a misleading way to evoke an emotional reaction from the reader. a) You only know about his coming home from work because that is what he chose to tell you. He wants you to identify with him, to remember that exhausted feeling after a hard day of work. b) You know nothing about her circumstances. That allows the reader to inject their personal bias into the scenario, which you can see from the varied responses to the post. Your bias is toward a traditional provider/home maker relationship, which is why in your opinion such an opinion is "baked in" to the scenario. I don't have that bias because I know too many women who work and still do the majority of the household work. My experience is not the exception - there is a tremendous amount of research on this topic. We are a generation of young women who were told we could do anything and instead heard that we had to be everything. Courtney E. Martin So, maybe she works. Maybe she doesn't work outside the home but recently gave birth to twins and hasn't slept properly in weeks. Maybe she has a chronic illness that makes cooking difficult. Maybe she was never taught how to cook and is trying really hard to teach herself. Maybe that meal tastes amazing. All I'm asking is that you see her as a human who maybe had a tough day too. To think critically and not just allow your emotions to be manipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't state the information either way. She may or may not work. Insisting that she doesn't is YOU (and the original person I replied to) adding information. I accept that both options are possible. Can you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Agnostocism? 😂 If you were truly agnostic, you wouldn't have started pushing your view. As for logic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don't need to prove she definitely is working, that's not how logic works. It's sufficient that I can provide even one reasonable scenario under which she could be home earlier than him but still work full time, to disprove the statement that she doesn't work. So here you go: maybe she works from home, so she cooked because she didn't have to commute. I get it - you interpret this scenario as evidence of her being lazy and/or incompetent. You want to buy into that, for whatever personal reasons of your own, so you ignore the facts: The picture is misleading - the chicken is cooked, that colour is a sauce. You can tell if you look closely to the right of the chicken, and to the area below the chicken where the sauce comes onto the vegetables. So not only did she cook him chicken, she even made him a sauce with it. The scenario is similarly presented in a misleading way to evoke an emotional reaction from the reader. a) You only know about his coming home from work because that is what he chose to tell you. He wants you to identify with him, to remember that exhausted feeling after a hard day of work. b) You know nothing about her circumstances. That allows the reader to inject their personal bias into the scenario, which you can see from the varied responses to the post. Your bias is toward a traditional provider/home maker relationship, which is why in your opinion such an opinion is "baked in" to the scenario. I don't have that bias because I know too many women who work and still do the majority of the household work. My experience is not the exception - there is a tremendous amount of research on this topic. We are a generation of young women who were told we could do anything and instead heard that we had to be everything. Courtney E. Martin So, maybe she works. Maybe she doesn't work outside the home but recently gave birth to twins and hasn't slept properly in weeks. Maybe she has a chronic illness that makes cooking difficult. Maybe she was never taught how to cook and is trying really hard to teach herself. Maybe that meal tastes amazing. All I'm asking is that you see her as a human who maybe had a tough day too. To think critically and not just allow your emotions to be manipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) It doesn't state the information either way. She may or may not work. Insisting that she doesn't is YOU (and the original person I replied to) adding information. I accept that both options are possible. Can you? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Agnostocism? 😂 If you were truly agnostic, you wouldn't have started pushing your view. As for logic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don't need to prove she definitely is working, that's not how logic works. It's sufficient that I can provide even one reasonable scenario under which she could be home earlier than him but still work full time, to disprove the statement that she doesn't work. So here you go: maybe she works from home, so she cooked because she didn't have to commute. I get it - you interpret this scenario as evidence of her being lazy and/or incompetent. You want to buy into that, for whatever personal reasons of your own, so you ignore the facts: The picture is misleading - the chicken is cooked, that colour is a sauce. You can tell if you look closely to the right of the chicken, and to the area below the chicken where the sauce comes onto the vegetables. So not only did she cook him chicken, she even made him a sauce with it. The scenario is similarly presented in a misleading way to evoke an emotional reaction from the reader. a) You only know about his coming home from work because that is what he chose to tell you. He wants you to identify with him, to remember that exhausted feeling after a hard day of work. b) You know nothing about her circumstances. That allows the reader to inject their personal bias into the scenario, which you can see from the varied responses to the post. Your bias is toward a traditional provider/home maker relationship, which is why in your opinion such an opinion is "baked in" to the scenario. I don't have that bias because I know too many women who work and still do the majority of the household work. My experience is not the exception - there is a tremendous amount of research on this topic. We are a generation of young women who were told we could do anything and instead heard that we had to be everything. Courtney E. Martin So, maybe she works. Maybe she doesn't work outside the home but recently gave birth to twins and hasn't slept properly in weeks. Maybe she has a chronic illness that makes cooking difficult. Maybe she was never taught how to cook and is trying really hard to teach herself. Maybe that meal tastes amazing. All I'm asking is that you see her as a human who maybe had a tough day too. To think critically and not just allow your emotions to be manipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Agnostocism? 😂 If you were truly agnostic, you wouldn't have started pushing your view. As for logic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don't need to prove she definitely is working, that's not how logic works. It's sufficient that I can provide even one reasonable scenario under which she could be home earlier than him but still work full time, to disprove the statement that she doesn't work. So here you go: maybe she works from home, so she cooked because she didn't have to commute. I get it - you interpret this scenario as evidence of her being lazy and/or incompetent. You want to buy into that, for whatever personal reasons of your own, so you ignore the facts: The picture is misleading - the chicken is cooked, that colour is a sauce. You can tell if you look closely to the right of the chicken, and to the area below the chicken where the sauce comes onto the vegetables. So not only did she cook him chicken, she even made him a sauce with it. The scenario is similarly presented in a misleading way to evoke an emotional reaction from the reader. a) You only know about his coming home from work because that is what he chose to tell you. He wants you to identify with him, to remember that exhausted feeling after a hard day of work. b) You know nothing about her circumstances. That allows the reader to inject their personal bias into the scenario, which you can see from the varied responses to the post. Your bias is toward a traditional provider/home maker relationship, which is why in your opinion such an opinion is "baked in" to the scenario. I don't have that bias because I know too many women who work and still do the majority of the household work. My experience is not the exception - there is a tremendous amount of research on this topic. We are a generation of young women who were told we could do anything and instead heard that we had to be everything. Courtney E. Martin So, maybe she works. Maybe she doesn't work outside the home but recently gave birth to twins and hasn't slept properly in weeks. Maybe she has a chronic illness that makes cooking difficult. Maybe she was never taught how to cook and is trying really hard to teach herself. Maybe that meal tastes amazing. All I'm asking is that you see her as a human who maybe had a tough day too. To think critically and not just allow your emotions to be manipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Agnostocism? 😂 If you were truly agnostic, you wouldn't have started pushing your view. As for logic 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I don't need to prove she definitely is working, that's not how logic works. It's sufficient that I can provide even one reasonable scenario under which she could be home earlier than him but still work full time, to disprove the statement that she doesn't work. So here you go: maybe she works from home, so she cooked because she didn't have to commute. I get it - you interpret this scenario as evidence of her being lazy and/or incompetent. You want to buy into that, for whatever personal reasons of your own, so you ignore the facts: The picture is misleading - the chicken is cooked, that colour is a sauce. You can tell if you look closely to the right of the chicken, and to the area below the chicken where the sauce comes onto the vegetables. So not only did she cook him chicken, she even made him a sauce with it. The scenario is similarly presented in a misleading way to evoke an emotional reaction from the reader. a) You only know about his coming home from work because that is what he chose to tell you. He wants you to identify with him, to remember that exhausted feeling after a hard day of work. b) You know nothing about her circumstances. That allows the reader to inject their personal bias into the scenario, which you can see from the varied responses to the post. Your bias is toward a traditional provider/home maker relationship, which is why in your opinion such an opinion is "baked in" to the scenario. I don't have that bias because I know too many women who work and still do the majority of the household work. My experience is not the exception - there is a tremendous amount of research on this topic. We are a generation of young women who were told we could do anything and instead heard that we had to be everything. Courtney E. Martin So, maybe she works. Maybe she doesn't work outside the home but recently gave birth to twins and hasn't slept properly in weeks. Maybe she has a chronic illness that makes cooking difficult. Maybe she was never taught how to cook and is trying really hard to teach herself. Maybe that meal tastes amazing. All I'm asking is that you see her as a human who maybe had a tough day too. To think critically and not just allow your emotions to be manipulated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Distractor@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Oooohhh personal attacks... yep, you have nothing of value to respond with. Byyyyyeee permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent