you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -15 points 3 years ago* (3 children)

It's more like blackmail tbh. "Pay or i'll track the shit out of you and sell the data to advertisers". I can see why people are put off, and I am also. And what's the guarantee if we pay that the data isn't collected and sold anyway?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago

    That's totally reasonable from the point of view of a developer who has to earn something to live. I mean you still have the choice to not use it. The internet simply works through user tracking and advertising

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -11 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Gawd, tinfoil hats are in right now!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    How's it tinfoil hat? It's very clear how much tracking is going on if you don't subscribe. None of this stuff is made up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I think he meant your last part. You say there is a chance that LJ will collect and sell data, although you paid for premium. That's a unnecessary accusation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    My last part was a question, not an accusation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    We call that JAQing off and it's never just a question.

    "They don't answer me, conclusion is they do that thing I disagree with even if I don't have proof of it."

    Right out of the alt-right playbook but applied outside of politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Wtf are you even smoking? See, another question that you can respond to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)

    If the dev tells you "information gathering is deactivated for users who pay." you won't believe them, you'll just move the goalpost and ask that they prove it by releasing their code, which they won't do because their app isn't open source and you'll conclude that because they won't prove it then we should just assume that they do.

    That's JAQing off and that's exactly where you were heading with that first question. Guilty until proven innocent, but you don't accuse directly, you're Just Asking Questions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Then don't use it if that bothers you. It's not blackmail lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    @Lmaydev @quantum_mechanic

    You can stop using that for free, you can continue using it for free with ads, you can subscribe and use it without ads, you can buy lifetime access and use it without ads

    So many options

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Plenty of options for people with plenty of money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments