Sex-worker exclusionary radical feminist. TBH not knowing that acronym disqualifies you from discussing the issue.

Does this apply to people who are voluntarily or by force engaged in sex work too? This seems more like academic leftists gatekeeping.

And that doesn’t also apply to call centre employees, youtube hosts, news anchors, whatnot?

Who are at a much lower risk of human trafficking, have access to labor unions and workplace protections...

but so are you when it comes to who picked the coffee you’re drinking.

While not perfect, i buy fair trade coffee, which means at least some level of oversight. And picking coffee under exploitative circumstances is terrible, but a different level than being raped for the entertainment of millions of people, where the recordings remain even decades after, if the exploitation can be stopped.

And the only way to do that, that has actually data behind it and not just “sex work inherently bad” type of ideology, is regulation.

Which is much harder in the digital space and cannot be enforced realistically by Sweden. Even if they would create a certification process and do regular workspace inspections, these could only be enforced inside Sweden. And even that is limited by the trivial ease of using VPNs to claim a different location. So the only option is to prohibit that market.

Read this.

Earlier you criticized that i provided a source discussion the situation multiple years ago. Now you provide a source that is from the same time and does not address nor distinguish between analog and digital.

There is a fundamental difference between digital and analog. So the criticism needs to distinguish between these two. You gave the example of street workers yourself.

If you criticise the Swedish ban on buying digital sex work, how do you envision to protect digital sex work from human trafficking, provide access to social work and the like? What is the better alternative?