▲ 121 ▼ Lyft now lets drivers prioritize matches with women and nonbinary riders (www.theverge.com) submitted 2 years ago by Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] dsmk@lemmy.zip 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] otter@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago They'd need a toggle for the feature on the rider side as well. Like "hide my gender" permalink fedilink source parent [–] glimse@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) Wouldn't need it at all if rideshare drivers stopped sexually assaulting passengers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] db2@sopuli.xyz 28 points 2 years ago (3 children) There are plenty of sexually aggressive riders too. It's not one sided. We can summarize it thus: people suck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) Perhaps this whole "random people using their regular car to give rides to total strangers" thing was a bad idea... What if instead the rides were given in specially modified cars that can include some security features for both parties? And in order to pay for this, perhaps there could be some kind of central company that owned the cars and simply hired the drivers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] db2@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 years ago That's just crazy talk. Next you'll tell us there should be really big municipally-run cars that a whole bunch of people can ride at once which makes multiple stops. Insanity! permalink fedilink source parent [–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago On one hand, yes. On the other hand, have you known many companies that have successfully weeded out creeps that work there? permalink fedilink source parent [–] glimse@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago True! Good point permalink fedilink source parent [–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago riders were the accused party 43% of the time in sexual assault incident reports permalink fedilink source parent [+] dsmk@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'd assume if you get legal action thrown at you though, it'd be a lot harder to deny if you also were picking a gender to get specific drivers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] dsmk@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago I'm pretty sure the nefarious purpose one isn't actually dealt with by this and is an extreme outlier permalink fedilink source parent [–] flumph@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Explain how sorting the list of available passengers by gender is discrimination? It's being rolled out in huge metropolitan markets so there will be enough drivers for everyone to get one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] bou@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) @flumph if they allowed sorting the list by race, instead of by gender... would you understand how it's discrimination, then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flumph@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The protected category doesn't matter, I don't see how anyone is getting a leg up or being held back by the feature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bou@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago @flumph so, if there was a button that allowed drivers to prioritize white passengers, but there wasn't one to prioritize black passengers, that wouldn't be discriminatory to you? permalink fedilink source parent [+] dsmk@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago The option allows customers to prioritize drivers... Nope, it doesn't. The feature is for drivers, not passengers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago They'd need a toggle for the feature on the rider side as well. Like "hide my gender" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children) Wouldn't need it at all if rideshare drivers stopped sexually assaulting passengers permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] db2@sopuli.xyz 28 points 2 years ago (3 children) There are plenty of sexually aggressive riders too. It's not one sided. We can summarize it thus: people suck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) Perhaps this whole "random people using their regular car to give rides to total strangers" thing was a bad idea... What if instead the rides were given in specially modified cars that can include some security features for both parties? And in order to pay for this, perhaps there could be some kind of central company that owned the cars and simply hired the drivers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] db2@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 years ago That's just crazy talk. Next you'll tell us there should be really big municipally-run cars that a whole bunch of people can ride at once which makes multiple stops. Insanity! permalink fedilink source parent [–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago On one hand, yes. On the other hand, have you known many companies that have successfully weeded out creeps that work there? permalink fedilink source parent [–] glimse@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago True! Good point permalink fedilink source parent [–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago riders were the accused party 43% of the time in sexual assault incident reports permalink fedilink source parent [+] dsmk@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 28 points 2 years ago (3 children) There are plenty of sexually aggressive riders too. It's not one sided. We can summarize it thus: people suck. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) Perhaps this whole "random people using their regular car to give rides to total strangers" thing was a bad idea... What if instead the rides were given in specially modified cars that can include some security features for both parties? And in order to pay for this, perhaps there could be some kind of central company that owned the cars and simply hired the drivers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] db2@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 years ago That's just crazy talk. Next you'll tell us there should be really big municipally-run cars that a whole bunch of people can ride at once which makes multiple stops. Insanity! permalink fedilink source parent [–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago On one hand, yes. On the other hand, have you known many companies that have successfully weeded out creeps that work there? permalink fedilink source parent [–] glimse@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago True! Good point permalink fedilink source parent [–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago riders were the accused party 43% of the time in sexual assault incident reports permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago (2 children) Perhaps this whole "random people using their regular car to give rides to total strangers" thing was a bad idea... What if instead the rides were given in specially modified cars that can include some security features for both parties? And in order to pay for this, perhaps there could be some kind of central company that owned the cars and simply hired the drivers? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] db2@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 years ago That's just crazy talk. Next you'll tell us there should be really big municipally-run cars that a whole bunch of people can ride at once which makes multiple stops. Insanity! permalink fedilink source parent [–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago On one hand, yes. On the other hand, have you known many companies that have successfully weeded out creeps that work there? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 years ago That's just crazy talk. Next you'll tell us there should be really big municipally-run cars that a whole bunch of people can ride at once which makes multiple stops. Insanity! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago On one hand, yes. On the other hand, have you known many companies that have successfully weeded out creeps that work there? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago riders were the accused party 43% of the time in sexual assault incident reports permalink fedilink source parent
[+] dsmk@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I'd assume if you get legal action thrown at you though, it'd be a lot harder to deny if you also were picking a gender to get specific drivers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] dsmk@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago I'm pretty sure the nefarious purpose one isn't actually dealt with by this and is an extreme outlier permalink fedilink source parent
[+] dsmk@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago I'm pretty sure the nefarious purpose one isn't actually dealt with by this and is an extreme outlier permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago I'm pretty sure the nefarious purpose one isn't actually dealt with by this and is an extreme outlier permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flumph@programming.dev -3 points 2 years ago (2 children) Explain how sorting the list of available passengers by gender is discrimination? It's being rolled out in huge metropolitan markets so there will be enough drivers for everyone to get one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] bou@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) @flumph if they allowed sorting the list by race, instead of by gender... would you understand how it's discrimination, then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flumph@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The protected category doesn't matter, I don't see how anyone is getting a leg up or being held back by the feature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bou@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago @flumph so, if there was a button that allowed drivers to prioritize white passengers, but there wasn't one to prioritize black passengers, that wouldn't be discriminatory to you? permalink fedilink source parent [+] dsmk@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago The option allows customers to prioritize drivers... Nope, it doesn't. The feature is for drivers, not passengers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bou@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) @flumph if they allowed sorting the list by race, instead of by gender... would you understand how it's discrimination, then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flumph@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The protected category doesn't matter, I don't see how anyone is getting a leg up or being held back by the feature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bou@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago @flumph so, if there was a button that allowed drivers to prioritize white passengers, but there wasn't one to prioritize black passengers, that wouldn't be discriminatory to you? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flumph@programming.dev 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) The protected category doesn't matter, I don't see how anyone is getting a leg up or being held back by the feature. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bou@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago @flumph so, if there was a button that allowed drivers to prioritize white passengers, but there wasn't one to prioritize black passengers, that wouldn't be discriminatory to you? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bou@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago @flumph so, if there was a button that allowed drivers to prioritize white passengers, but there wasn't one to prioritize black passengers, that wouldn't be discriminatory to you? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] dsmk@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago The option allows customers to prioritize drivers... Nope, it doesn't. The feature is for drivers, not passengers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago The option allows customers to prioritize drivers... Nope, it doesn't. The feature is for drivers, not passengers. permalink fedilink source parent