In password security, the longer the better. With a password manager, using more than 24 characters is simple. Unless, of course, the secure password is not accepted due to its length. (In this case, through STOVE.)

Possibly indicating cleartext storage of a limited field (which is an absolute no-go), or suboptimal or lacking security practices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

There is little point of having a long password. Online accounts don't have the same issues as encryption

Edit: for those curious, here is my source https://cybersecuritynews.com/nist-rules-password-security/

My rationale is that online accounts typically don't get brute forced due to rate limiting and not protection. The NIST guidelines don't specify requirements for online accounts specifically but it does recommend a password of 16 characters in general. I don't really see any need to go above that as you are just making it harder on yourself.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I really hope you don't work in the tech industry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I've yet to see anyone link to a source

    Here is where I'm getting my info

    https://cybersecuritynews.com/nist-rules-password-security/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    you realize that they say the exact opposite of what you are saying, right?

    Longer passwords are generally more secure and easier for users to remember,” said Dr. Paul Turner, a cybersecurity expert at NIST. “We’re moving away from complex rules that often lead to predictable patterns and towards encouraging unique, lengthy passphrases.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You haven't provided any evidence to support your claim. Online accounts can't easily be brute forced.

    If a hash is leaked you just change the password. As long as you aren't reusing the same password everywhere you are fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That's simply false. Increased length increases the entropy of a password, making it harder to brute force to gain access.

    You have to go out of your way to restrict the length of passwords. There's absolutely no reason to do it, and it is contrary to all good security practices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago

    I'm not sure how you expect someone to brute force a web service. It is possible but it would be equivalent to a denial of service. Having long passwords for a online login makes no sense. A randomly generated 12 character password isn't any more or less secure than a 40 character password since they both take a unrealistic amount of time to brute force.

    A 12 character password made up of standard characters would take 475,920,314,814,253,376,475,136 tries assuming you know the length. I don't see how someone could brute force a web service.

    I will say I get annoyed at web services that require special characters since I like to use 3 words from the EFF extended word list.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    How old are you?

    The old security wisdom has been thrown out in favor of better practices. If you spend to much time focusing on one spot you will make everyone hate you while leaving gapping holes in your security.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Think of it from a random guess perspective. Guessing a number randomly generated between 0-16 is easier than guessing one between 0-8.

    Now think that all passwords are stored in certain amount of bits, so let's compare 4 and 8 bits.

    Each bit has a chance to be either 0 or 1, so guessing a single bit's possibility is 1/2.

    Guessing the correct orientation of 4 different bits takes 1/2^4^ = 1/16

    Guessing the correct orientation of 8 different bits takes 1/2^8^ = 1/256

    Now think passwords being stored in more bits(=longer password)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago

    At a certain point it doesn't matter as the password is effectively unguessable.

    One weakness with longer passwords is that if they are created by humans chances are it will be easier to guess the pattern. This is true for all human created passwords but I think the longer ones are worse since there is more space to create a easily guessable pattern.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago*

    As long as the adversary doesn't have the ability to brute force the password locally, you have the ability to reset in the event of a leaked hash and you aren't reusing passwords you are fine with a shorter password. Obviously be mindful of easily guessable passwords or ones that are very short. However, a 12 digit sufficiently random password is fine. Don't fall into the trap of longer but easier to guess.

    Don't do things like impossiblebatman1. Something like SalariedOverhand22 or imposiba1ttman

    The first secure one I used diceware to generate two random words and then a random number generator to add a number. The second one I randomly changed spelling and the pattern to increase entropy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Assuming a breach, and hashes are released, its significantly harder to bruteforce a long password.

    Some (a lot) poorly set up websites may not even have a limit on password attempts, or cooldowns.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments