you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So - in your opinion - any company shipping a USB 2 device is 'malicious'?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Apple was forced by the EU to stop using their old and worse connector

    So they're complying, but they're purposefully limiting the less expensive phone as a malicious compliance to that

    Pretty simple really

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So lightning cables offer transfer rates of 480Mb/s - USB 2.0 offers 625Mb/s. You are cross that they swapped out Lightning for USB on the main models and use USB 3 as a differentiator in the Pro models. Fair enough, but that's not 'malicious'. It's not even malicious compliance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Lightning connectors are definitely worse than USB-C, but when they were introduced the alternative was micro USB which is objectively worse than Lightning cables.

    Of course, with wireless charging I haven't used an actual cable in five years so it doesn't matter that much to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You obviously don't get the point. Educate yourself on Apple and USB-C, please.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    You mean the Apple that provided more than 20% of the engineering force that developed USBC?

    Or the Apple that released the first USBC laptop to market?

    That Apple?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments