Valmond comments on ‘Vibe coding’ using LLMs susceptible to most common security flaws

‘Vibe coding’ using LLMs susceptible to most common security flaws (www.scworld.com)

submitted 1 year ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/security@programming.dev

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Even classic coders doesn't automatically write safe and secure code.

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] meliante@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

That's the crux of it. People talk like most coders are some kind of know all security and best practices wise.

That's just a lie or virgin innocence.

Most coders are just keyboard monkeys, those are the replaceable ones.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] nexas_XIII@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Ah yes, as they gain experience and learn they’re still just keyboard monkeys. Guess we should go back and try to type up some Shakespeare eh?

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] meliante@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

LLMs have been improving at a much faster pace than a programmer gaining experience and learning.

Y'all are just burying your head in the sand.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] underscore_@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

Bogus comparison. Babies also gain skills and knowledge at a much higher rate than adults but they make poor software architects and are prone to being sick on hardware.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] meliante@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

What? That doesn't make any sense. You must be a pRoGrAmMeR!1!!11

parent