▲ 418 ▼ He’s all dressed up today (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world 55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 year ago (4 children) permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (2 children) Doesn't matter if they still let him go even though he doesn't respect the dress code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago (2 children) How does a 34-count felon pass through the countries? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world [S] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Many nations do not allow convicted felons to visit. Italy is not one of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago Pretty sure all of them will have forms that can be filled to allow access to felons with approval of the border services, it's the case in Canada and is the process that Bush had to go through to visit and that Trump will have to go through to visit as well. He will be let in, but the paperwork will have to be filled. permalink fedilink source parent [–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago He counts that as a win. MF lives for shit like this. Look up all the petty shit he did when he bought Mar-a-lago. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago Is a dark blue suit not a "dark suit?" Trump isn't even the only person wearing a dark blue suit in this picture: permalink fedilink source parent [–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children) What's with the dude wearing the white bowtie? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago Looks like he's also wearing a tailcoat. That's maximum formality. I assume as an indication of maximum respect. Probably not planning to tapdance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago White tie is a level of formality above black tie. He might probably a diplomat honoring him as head of state rather than as the head of Catholic Church. permalink fedilink source parent [–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago A Secret Server. permalink fedilink source parent [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) I fucking hate formalwear rules. Dark blue should count as a "dark suit", shouldn't it? If the expectation was "wear a black suit", then the rule should have been "wear a black suit". Even just having to wear a suit at all is stupid: "You must wear a special kind of jacket that doesn't properly close in front, creating a little window through which people can see the shirt you're wearing underneath, and a ribbon of pretty fabric you wear draped around your neck." Meanwhile, women are allowed to just use reasonable discretion as long as they're wearing a dress. The style of dress isn't specified (but of course most women will interpret it as "show a little bit of bare chest, but not too much, because it's a funeral") permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) All the women pictured here are wearing black in the strictest sense of the color what in the fuck are you even rambling about permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] merc@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (3 children) I wonder if future people will see the suit and tie and think about it similarly to how we look at paintings of people from the 17th century wearing Ruffs, and concluding that they looked silly. I sure do think ties look silly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Ties are especially ironic because they derived from a time when buttons - made by necessity out of rare items like ivory or whale bone - were expensive as fuck and it was cheaper to close up your neck with a strip of scrap fabric. Most people today can afford plastic buttons. permalink fedilink source parent [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Of course it will be seen as silly. Most people are just too used to them to see them that way today. It's like seeing judges wearing wigs and robes. At one point that was just normal formalwear, but it looks really goofy now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) I think suit/tie and dresses are the only type of clothing every human will recognize for as long as civilization as we know it doesn't crumble. You could show someone from 100300 years ago, a suit or a dress from today, and they would know what it was permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The suit is a 20th century invention. Someone might "know what it was", i.e. it's a jacket that doesn't close properly and matching pants. But, they didn't exist until the 20th century. It's a matter of time before they finally go out of fashion, and people look at them like we look at men wearing tights and shirts with puffy sleeves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Nah. It was invented in the 17th century. Edit: and the suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours https://myhistoryfix.com/fashion/mens-suits-history/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You think suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Not that far off permalink fedilink source parent [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Suit/tie combo has been the focul point of men's fashion longer than any other style(in western culture at least). It's remained more or less the same for over 100 years permalink fedilink source parent [–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago "Clothes-Optional" funerals are a blast when everyone is 73. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I agree if the expectation was for people to wear black only, then the text of the code should have said "black" and not "dark." Formal Dress Codes suck, but at the least the events are usually short and you can at least take off the tie and jacket, maybe roll up the shirt sleeves if they're long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Where do you draw the line between black and grey? Dark should mean black or dark grey. Although the reality is that nothing is truly black, one of the closest we've seen is Vanta Black. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Cartoonist Michael Leunig (r.i.p.) called them the 'business burkha' and I've thought of them as such ever since. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (2 children) Doesn't matter if they still let him go even though he doesn't respect the dress code. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago (2 children) How does a 34-count felon pass through the countries? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world [S] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Many nations do not allow convicted felons to visit. Italy is not one of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago Pretty sure all of them will have forms that can be filled to allow access to felons with approval of the border services, it's the case in Canada and is the process that Bush had to go through to visit and that Trump will have to go through to visit as well. He will be let in, but the paperwork will have to be filled. permalink fedilink source parent [–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago He counts that as a win. MF lives for shit like this. Look up all the petty shit he did when he bought Mar-a-lago. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago (2 children) How does a 34-count felon pass through the countries? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world [S] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Many nations do not allow convicted felons to visit. Italy is not one of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago Pretty sure all of them will have forms that can be filled to allow access to felons with approval of the border services, it's the case in Canada and is the process that Bush had to go through to visit and that Trump will have to go through to visit as well. He will be let in, but the paperwork will have to be filled. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world [S] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child) Many nations do not allow convicted felons to visit. Italy is not one of them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago Pretty sure all of them will have forms that can be filled to allow access to felons with approval of the border services, it's the case in Canada and is the process that Bush had to go through to visit and that Trump will have to go through to visit as well. He will be let in, but the paperwork will have to be filled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago Pretty sure all of them will have forms that can be filled to allow access to felons with approval of the border services, it's the case in Canada and is the process that Bush had to go through to visit and that Trump will have to go through to visit as well. He will be let in, but the paperwork will have to be filled. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago He counts that as a win. MF lives for shit like this. Look up all the petty shit he did when he bought Mar-a-lago. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago Is a dark blue suit not a "dark suit?" Trump isn't even the only person wearing a dark blue suit in this picture: permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children) What's with the dude wearing the white bowtie? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago Looks like he's also wearing a tailcoat. That's maximum formality. I assume as an indication of maximum respect. Probably not planning to tapdance. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago White tie is a level of formality above black tie. He might probably a diplomat honoring him as head of state rather than as the head of Catholic Church. permalink fedilink source parent [–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago A Secret Server. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago Looks like he's also wearing a tailcoat. That's maximum formality. I assume as an indication of maximum respect. Probably not planning to tapdance. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago White tie is a level of formality above black tie. He might probably a diplomat honoring him as head of state rather than as the head of Catholic Church. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 year ago A Secret Server. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children) I fucking hate formalwear rules. Dark blue should count as a "dark suit", shouldn't it? If the expectation was "wear a black suit", then the rule should have been "wear a black suit". Even just having to wear a suit at all is stupid: "You must wear a special kind of jacket that doesn't properly close in front, creating a little window through which people can see the shirt you're wearing underneath, and a ribbon of pretty fabric you wear draped around your neck." Meanwhile, women are allowed to just use reasonable discretion as long as they're wearing a dress. The style of dress isn't specified (but of course most women will interpret it as "show a little bit of bare chest, but not too much, because it's a funeral") permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) All the women pictured here are wearing black in the strictest sense of the color what in the fuck are you even rambling about permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] merc@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (3 children) I wonder if future people will see the suit and tie and think about it similarly to how we look at paintings of people from the 17th century wearing Ruffs, and concluding that they looked silly. I sure do think ties look silly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Ties are especially ironic because they derived from a time when buttons - made by necessity out of rare items like ivory or whale bone - were expensive as fuck and it was cheaper to close up your neck with a strip of scrap fabric. Most people today can afford plastic buttons. permalink fedilink source parent [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Of course it will be seen as silly. Most people are just too used to them to see them that way today. It's like seeing judges wearing wigs and robes. At one point that was just normal formalwear, but it looks really goofy now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) I think suit/tie and dresses are the only type of clothing every human will recognize for as long as civilization as we know it doesn't crumble. You could show someone from 100300 years ago, a suit or a dress from today, and they would know what it was permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The suit is a 20th century invention. Someone might "know what it was", i.e. it's a jacket that doesn't close properly and matching pants. But, they didn't exist until the 20th century. It's a matter of time before they finally go out of fashion, and people look at them like we look at men wearing tights and shirts with puffy sleeves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Nah. It was invented in the 17th century. Edit: and the suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours https://myhistoryfix.com/fashion/mens-suits-history/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You think suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Not that far off permalink fedilink source parent [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Suit/tie combo has been the focul point of men's fashion longer than any other style(in western culture at least). It's remained more or less the same for over 100 years permalink fedilink source parent [–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago "Clothes-Optional" funerals are a blast when everyone is 73. permalink fedilink source parent [–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I agree if the expectation was for people to wear black only, then the text of the code should have said "black" and not "dark." Formal Dress Codes suck, but at the least the events are usually short and you can at least take off the tie and jacket, maybe roll up the shirt sleeves if they're long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Where do you draw the line between black and grey? Dark should mean black or dark grey. Although the reality is that nothing is truly black, one of the closest we've seen is Vanta Black. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Cartoonist Michael Leunig (r.i.p.) called them the 'business burkha' and I've thought of them as such ever since. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 child) All the women pictured here are wearing black in the strictest sense of the color what in the fuck are you even rambling about permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] merc@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (3 children) I wonder if future people will see the suit and tie and think about it similarly to how we look at paintings of people from the 17th century wearing Ruffs, and concluding that they looked silly. I sure do think ties look silly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Ties are especially ironic because they derived from a time when buttons - made by necessity out of rare items like ivory or whale bone - were expensive as fuck and it was cheaper to close up your neck with a strip of scrap fabric. Most people today can afford plastic buttons. permalink fedilink source parent [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Of course it will be seen as silly. Most people are just too used to them to see them that way today. It's like seeing judges wearing wigs and robes. At one point that was just normal formalwear, but it looks really goofy now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) I think suit/tie and dresses are the only type of clothing every human will recognize for as long as civilization as we know it doesn't crumble. You could show someone from 100300 years ago, a suit or a dress from today, and they would know what it was permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The suit is a 20th century invention. Someone might "know what it was", i.e. it's a jacket that doesn't close properly and matching pants. But, they didn't exist until the 20th century. It's a matter of time before they finally go out of fashion, and people look at them like we look at men wearing tights and shirts with puffy sleeves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Nah. It was invented in the 17th century. Edit: and the suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours https://myhistoryfix.com/fashion/mens-suits-history/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You think suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Not that far off permalink fedilink source parent [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Suit/tie combo has been the focul point of men's fashion longer than any other style(in western culture at least). It's remained more or less the same for over 100 years permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Ties are especially ironic because they derived from a time when buttons - made by necessity out of rare items like ivory or whale bone - were expensive as fuck and it was cheaper to close up your neck with a strip of scrap fabric. Most people today can afford plastic buttons. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Of course it will be seen as silly. Most people are just too used to them to see them that way today. It's like seeing judges wearing wigs and robes. At one point that was just normal formalwear, but it looks really goofy now. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) I think suit/tie and dresses are the only type of clothing every human will recognize for as long as civilization as we know it doesn't crumble. You could show someone from 100300 years ago, a suit or a dress from today, and they would know what it was permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The suit is a 20th century invention. Someone might "know what it was", i.e. it's a jacket that doesn't close properly and matching pants. But, they didn't exist until the 20th century. It's a matter of time before they finally go out of fashion, and people look at them like we look at men wearing tights and shirts with puffy sleeves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Nah. It was invented in the 17th century. Edit: and the suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours https://myhistoryfix.com/fashion/mens-suits-history/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You think suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Not that far off permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) I think suit/tie and dresses are the only type of clothing every human will recognize for as long as civilization as we know it doesn't crumble. You could show someone from 100300 years ago, a suit or a dress from today, and they would know what it was permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The suit is a 20th century invention. Someone might "know what it was", i.e. it's a jacket that doesn't close properly and matching pants. But, they didn't exist until the 20th century. It's a matter of time before they finally go out of fashion, and people look at them like we look at men wearing tights and shirts with puffy sleeves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Nah. It was invented in the 17th century. Edit: and the suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours https://myhistoryfix.com/fashion/mens-suits-history/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You think suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Not that far off permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) The suit is a 20th century invention. Someone might "know what it was", i.e. it's a jacket that doesn't close properly and matching pants. But, they didn't exist until the 20th century. It's a matter of time before they finally go out of fashion, and people look at them like we look at men wearing tights and shirts with puffy sleeves. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Nah. It was invented in the 17th century. Edit: and the suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours https://myhistoryfix.com/fashion/mens-suits-history/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You think suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Not that far off permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) Nah. It was invented in the 17th century. Edit: and the suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours https://myhistoryfix.com/fashion/mens-suits-history/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You think suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Not that far off permalink fedilink source parent
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You think suits from the 18th century look almost exactly the same as ours? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago Not that far off permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Suit/tie combo has been the focul point of men's fashion longer than any other style(in western culture at least). It's remained more or less the same for over 100 years permalink fedilink source parent
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago "Clothes-Optional" funerals are a blast when everyone is 73. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) I agree if the expectation was for people to wear black only, then the text of the code should have said "black" and not "dark." Formal Dress Codes suck, but at the least the events are usually short and you can at least take off the tie and jacket, maybe roll up the shirt sleeves if they're long. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Where do you draw the line between black and grey? Dark should mean black or dark grey. Although the reality is that nothing is truly black, one of the closest we've seen is Vanta Black. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Where do you draw the line between black and grey? Dark should mean black or dark grey. Although the reality is that nothing is truly black, one of the closest we've seen is Vanta Black. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 point 1 year ago Cartoonist Michael Leunig (r.i.p.) called them the 'business burkha' and I've thought of them as such ever since. permalink fedilink source parent