you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why eliminate standardized testing?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Because then education ends up being about the damn test instead of developing beings. The goal shouldn't be passing the test, it should be learning how to learn, plus a good base in general knowledge so that you can apply critical thinking and successfully integrate new knowledge and experiences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Would you say the same about other tests, like for driving, engineers, doctors, ...? Or is this issue unrelated to the concept of tests but instead how they are implemented or done?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Skill tests evaluate a person's knowledge of that skill. Standardized testing in theory evaluates a student's knowledge of the material tested, but in practice teachers often focus more on test-taking strategies in order to boost scores and secure funding. In theory these tests should incentivize learning the material, in practice they incentivize learning to take the test.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    So we should not remove the standardized testing but how the tests are done...?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    "tests": Bulemic learning by heart of lecture material just to pass the damn exam and forget most of the stuff a bit later anyway. Practical relevance of tests: approximating zero.

    That's why a lot of "younger" companies don't even look that critically at grades anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It doesn’t promote knowledge, it’s gamed, and it’s used to further discriminate against schools that need funds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Problem of a poorly designed test and and poorly implemented standard. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water. You need to test but designing tests that test the thing you are looking for is EXTREMELY hard. This is also part of the alignment problem with AI. If we had this stuff nailed down it would be nice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's been successfully demonized by teachers unions over the years. While there are limitations, with the medium, it's far from useless. It can't fully assess mastery of a subject, but it can determine basic and applied understanding of one. It's a very simple step to expand from student competency to teacher competency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments