▲ 1323 ▼ Rolling coal (slrpnk.net) submitted 1 year ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world 128 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Cypher@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FleetingTit@feddit.org 8 points 1 year ago Power is not the issue. Cabovers can have just as much power as long-hood tractors. permalink fedilink source parent [–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'd imagine most road trains to run between cities, or mines, ports, industry, and cities. Building railways between them would certainly make sense, but it'd have to be the state, no single actor alone would make that investment. What I mean to say is that trains are better and you could have them if you just chose to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) You misunderstand. The trains aren't for the supply of tiny settlements. It's fine to use road vehicles for this. I am specifically talking about industry, cities, ports, mines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Of course not. I think Australia could have more. If the Australians wanted to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FleetingTit@feddit.org 8 points 1 year ago Power is not the issue. Cabovers can have just as much power as long-hood tractors. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I'd imagine most road trains to run between cities, or mines, ports, industry, and cities. Building railways between them would certainly make sense, but it'd have to be the state, no single actor alone would make that investment. What I mean to say is that trains are better and you could have them if you just chose to. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) You misunderstand. The trains aren't for the supply of tiny settlements. It's fine to use road vehicles for this. I am specifically talking about industry, cities, ports, mines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Of course not. I think Australia could have more. If the Australians wanted to. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Cypher@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) You misunderstand. The trains aren't for the supply of tiny settlements. It's fine to use road vehicles for this. I am specifically talking about industry, cities, ports, mines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Of course not. I think Australia could have more. If the Australians wanted to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child) You misunderstand. The trains aren't for the supply of tiny settlements. It's fine to use road vehicles for this. I am specifically talking about industry, cities, ports, mines. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Of course not. I think Australia could have more. If the Australians wanted to. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Cypher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Of course not. I think Australia could have more. If the Australians wanted to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 1 point 1 year ago Of course not. I think Australia could have more. If the Australians wanted to. permalink fedilink source parent