Privacy

50,375 readers

5,070 active

640 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago

moderators

Is Qwant still good privacy wise? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago by fievel@lemm.ee to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I use Qwant as my default search engine because I thought it was more respectful of my privacy than Google or Bing and DuckDuckGo is not giving so good results in my country (for localization related searches).

I noticed that the engine was removed from the default engines for URL bar in latest IronFox version. So I searched a bit about why so, and found this issue in their tracker : https://gitlab.com/ironfox-oss/IronFox/-/issues/47.

What to think about this ? The message from ironfox dev seems clear but qwant seems to claim that the shared data are anonymized.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] fievel@lemm.ee [S] 3 points 1 year ago

This is how I interpreted the policy too but wanted to be sure about it. It's so easy to get lost in juridic language.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

lemmy:	0.19.20
mlmym (mschae):	26.3.4