▲ 1319 ▼ Reddit will warn users who repeatedly upvote banned content (www.theverge.com) submitted 1 year ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world 556 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] RustySharp@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Or just open the thread on an mbin instance. Here's everyone that upvoted this thread. Edit: Downvotes (reduces) are less exposed, but as you said, someone can just run a fedi instance that exposes them to everyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think all reactions should be exposed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yeah idk why ppl dont like this, id prefer ppl lurk and not vote if they dont do it with their chest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 3 points 1 year ago Well end up with so many alternatives that access the threadiverse differently, some that mask your upvotes/downvotes somehow, some that are open about it and block those that mask them lol, fractured community permalink fedilink source parent [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago It's also the herd reaction. It may be enough to have a couple of bots downvote or upvote something, and then the crowd goes after them. Not even talking about, say, someone being pissed and going to other user's profile to downvote all their recent comments. It's just useful to see such things - one-day-old accounts putting reactions, and one and the same user following you to press their internet satisfaction arrow. In any case anonymous reactions just don't make any sense, it's a number, what if most in that number are jerks? (Actually they are, I can't imagine stooping low enough to care to put a downvote, but not writing why). permalink fedilink source parent [–] xnx@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Piefed upvotes are private though permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Only for untrusted instances iirc. I just tried to check this by looking at one of rimu's (piefed's dev) posts and indeed I can see upvotes by piefed.social users from kbin.earth. They're real usernames too, not just randomly generated ones like I've seen proposed in one discussion on private voting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 point 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago (1 child) I will save him the effort. I happily upvote things that contain the words Luigi and Elon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wilco@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago Because that word combination just makes sense. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 12 points 1 year ago He can see me upvote people wanting to kill him. permalink fedilink source parent [–] muhyb@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago* Though you cannot see votes coming from a blocked instance. (If your instance ever blocked another instance. Not valid for self hosted.) permalink fedilink source parent [+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] JulieLemming@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago You just need to make a new account every couple of months permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RustySharp@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Or just open the thread on an mbin instance. Here's everyone that upvoted this thread. Edit: Downvotes (reduces) are less exposed, but as you said, someone can just run a fedi instance that exposes them to everyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think all reactions should be exposed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yeah idk why ppl dont like this, id prefer ppl lurk and not vote if they dont do it with their chest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 3 points 1 year ago Well end up with so many alternatives that access the threadiverse differently, some that mask your upvotes/downvotes somehow, some that are open about it and block those that mask them lol, fractured community permalink fedilink source parent [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago It's also the herd reaction. It may be enough to have a couple of bots downvote or upvote something, and then the crowd goes after them. Not even talking about, say, someone being pissed and going to other user's profile to downvote all their recent comments. It's just useful to see such things - one-day-old accounts putting reactions, and one and the same user following you to press their internet satisfaction arrow. In any case anonymous reactions just don't make any sense, it's a number, what if most in that number are jerks? (Actually they are, I can't imagine stooping low enough to care to put a downvote, but not writing why). permalink fedilink source parent [–] xnx@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Piefed upvotes are private though permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Only for untrusted instances iirc. I just tried to check this by looking at one of rimu's (piefed's dev) posts and indeed I can see upvotes by piefed.social users from kbin.earth. They're real usernames too, not just randomly generated ones like I've seen proposed in one discussion on private voting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 point 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think all reactions should be exposed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yeah idk why ppl dont like this, id prefer ppl lurk and not vote if they dont do it with their chest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 3 points 1 year ago Well end up with so many alternatives that access the threadiverse differently, some that mask your upvotes/downvotes somehow, some that are open about it and block those that mask them lol, fractured community permalink fedilink source parent [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago It's also the herd reaction. It may be enough to have a couple of bots downvote or upvote something, and then the crowd goes after them. Not even talking about, say, someone being pissed and going to other user's profile to downvote all their recent comments. It's just useful to see such things - one-day-old accounts putting reactions, and one and the same user following you to press their internet satisfaction arrow. In any case anonymous reactions just don't make any sense, it's a number, what if most in that number are jerks? (Actually they are, I can't imagine stooping low enough to care to put a downvote, but not writing why). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing -2 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yeah idk why ppl dont like this, id prefer ppl lurk and not vote if they dont do it with their chest permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 3 points 1 year ago Well end up with so many alternatives that access the threadiverse differently, some that mask your upvotes/downvotes somehow, some that are open about it and block those that mask them lol, fractured community permalink fedilink source parent [–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago It's also the herd reaction. It may be enough to have a couple of bots downvote or upvote something, and then the crowd goes after them. Not even talking about, say, someone being pissed and going to other user's profile to downvote all their recent comments. It's just useful to see such things - one-day-old accounts putting reactions, and one and the same user following you to press their internet satisfaction arrow. In any case anonymous reactions just don't make any sense, it's a number, what if most in that number are jerks? (Actually they are, I can't imagine stooping low enough to care to put a downvote, but not writing why). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 3 points 1 year ago Well end up with so many alternatives that access the threadiverse differently, some that mask your upvotes/downvotes somehow, some that are open about it and block those that mask them lol, fractured community permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago It's also the herd reaction. It may be enough to have a couple of bots downvote or upvote something, and then the crowd goes after them. Not even talking about, say, someone being pissed and going to other user's profile to downvote all their recent comments. It's just useful to see such things - one-day-old accounts putting reactions, and one and the same user following you to press their internet satisfaction arrow. In any case anonymous reactions just don't make any sense, it's a number, what if most in that number are jerks? (Actually they are, I can't imagine stooping low enough to care to put a downvote, but not writing why). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xnx@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Piefed upvotes are private though permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Only for untrusted instances iirc. I just tried to check this by looking at one of rimu's (piefed's dev) posts and indeed I can see upvotes by piefed.social users from kbin.earth. They're real usernames too, not just randomly generated ones like I've seen proposed in one discussion on private voting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 point 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Only for untrusted instances iirc. I just tried to check this by looking at one of rimu's (piefed's dev) posts and indeed I can see upvotes by piefed.social users from kbin.earth. They're real usernames too, not just randomly generated ones like I've seen proposed in one discussion on private voting. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] Pamasich@kbin.earth 1 point 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago (1 child) I will save him the effort. I happily upvote things that contain the words Luigi and Elon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wilco@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago Because that word combination just makes sense. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago Because that word combination just makes sense. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 12 points 1 year ago He can see me upvote people wanting to kill him. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] muhyb@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago* Though you cannot see votes coming from a blocked instance. (If your instance ever blocked another instance. Not valid for self hosted.) permalink fedilink source parent
[+] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JulieLemming@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago You just need to make a new account every couple of months permalink fedilink source parent