▲ 183 ▼ Why is there only one invidious instance left? (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 1 year ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/privacy@lemmy.ml 32 comments fedilink hide all child comments Did the others all decide to quit or is there a practical reason?
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children) Did you run the token generator thing? Worked for me a couple days ago (but not over a VPN). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I haven't, no. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Shit for privacy, but that should fix it permalink fedilink source parent [–] mike_wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com 4 points 1 year ago That works for me, for a while. I also auto-restart the invidious container stack hourly, per their recommendation. But sooner or later it fails, and usually the fix is to recreate a token. It only takes a minute, but it's a hassle to do often. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I haven't, no. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Shit for privacy, but that should fix it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago Shit for privacy, but that should fix it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mike_wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com 4 points 1 year ago That works for me, for a while. I also auto-restart the invidious container stack hourly, per their recommendation. But sooner or later it fails, and usually the fix is to recreate a token. It only takes a minute, but it's a hassle to do often. permalink fedilink source parent
