you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Rare that people here argument for LLMs like that here, usually it is the same kind of "uga suga, AI bad, did not already solve world hunger".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Lemmy is understandably sympathetic to self-hosted AI, but I get chewed out or even banned literally anywhere else.

    In one fandom (the Avatar fandom), there used to be enthusiasm for a "community enhancement" of the original show since the official DVD/Blu-ray looks awful. Years later in a new thread, I don't even mention the word "AI," just the idea of restoration, and I got bombed and threadlocked for the mere tangential implication.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Your comment would be acceptable if AI was not advertised as solving all our problems, like world hunger.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    What a nuanced representation of the position, I just feel trustworthiness oozes out of the screen.
    In case you're using random words generation machine to summarise this comment for you, it was a sarcasm, and I meant the opposite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ask a forest burning machine to read the surrounding treads for you, then you will find the arguments you're looking for. You have at least 80% chance it will produce something coherent, and unknown chance of there being something correct, but hey, reading is hard amirite?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    "If you try hard you might find arguments for my side"

    What kind of meta-argument is that supposed to be?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments