▲ 399 ▼ Looks legit, but can it actually be a real thing? (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by Mickey7@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 80 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world [S] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children) Would I be able to fool the scanner if I completely shaved my member and scrotum, and then tucked my member under my thigh? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) So TSA is practically seeing everyone naked? Is that for real? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] griff@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] griff@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] obstbert@feddit.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Here on wikipedia it says they don't, because the software is automated and only displays a blurred image. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Speculater@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) But the raw data of every single American who had flown does exist. The government has a database of every tattoo, mole, and genital of everyone who has ever used an airplane. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago I like to force them to touch me personally. That way I at least get something out of this bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) What's the point of scanning someone at that level of precision if they can't even see it? Seems pretty pointless to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well its intended function is not to generate nonconsensual nudes, but to detect the presence of weapons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 2 points 1 year ago lol, I get that part, but how can they assess the presence of weapons if it's blurred. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago Not everyone, but I'd bet the NSA and CIA keep copies permalink fedilink source parent [–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Shorts covered with quartz sequins would scatter the image enough to blind the scanner. Make sure they're mounted with glue instead of metal mounts, or they'll fail the metal detector. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) what in the fuck would shaving change? you wanna go buffalo bill at the airport knock yourself out, but you dont need an excuse to shave your junk, wild man permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mickey7@lemmy.world [S] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) You just had to ruin my fun of having an excuse to shave my balls permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago my point is you dont need to be trying to tuck your shit to convince the tsa that you're a chick bro. just shave that shit bro. i havent shaved my garbage for a good long while. as ive gotten older, the ball hair has increased in density, it might be refreshing to go cue-ball. i had a friend (had, as he doesnt talk to me anymore cause he needed to borrow €100 and is always broke so will prolly never pay it back) who was a big evangelist for shaving your shit. he was a bit of a locker room pervert.. anyway he said one time he was shearing his nuts and sliced off like a 2mm section of scrotum skin (not all the way to the vas defferens or anything, just deep into the layers of skin), and he said the blood came out like a ruby red fire suppression sprinkler and he couldnt get it to stop permalink fedilink source parent [–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Do it for the ladies. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) So TSA is practically seeing everyone naked? Is that for real? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] griff@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] griff@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] obstbert@feddit.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Here on wikipedia it says they don't, because the software is automated and only displays a blurred image. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Speculater@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) But the raw data of every single American who had flown does exist. The government has a database of every tattoo, mole, and genital of everyone who has ever used an airplane. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago I like to force them to touch me personally. That way I at least get something out of this bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) What's the point of scanning someone at that level of precision if they can't even see it? Seems pretty pointless to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well its intended function is not to generate nonconsensual nudes, but to detect the presence of weapons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 2 points 1 year ago lol, I get that part, but how can they assess the presence of weapons if it's blurred. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago Not everyone, but I'd bet the NSA and CIA keep copies permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) So TSA is practically seeing everyone naked? Is that for real? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] griff@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] griff@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] obstbert@feddit.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Here on wikipedia it says they don't, because the software is automated and only displays a blurred image. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Speculater@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) But the raw data of every single American who had flown does exist. The government has a database of every tattoo, mole, and genital of everyone who has ever used an airplane. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago I like to force them to touch me personally. That way I at least get something out of this bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) What's the point of scanning someone at that level of precision if they can't even see it? Seems pretty pointless to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well its intended function is not to generate nonconsensual nudes, but to detect the presence of weapons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 2 points 1 year ago lol, I get that part, but how can they assess the presence of weapons if it's blurred. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago Not everyone, but I'd bet the NSA and CIA keep copies permalink fedilink source parent
[+] someoneelse@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] griff@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] griff@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] griff@lemmings.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] griff@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] obstbert@feddit.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children) Here on wikipedia it says they don't, because the software is automated and only displays a blurred image. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Speculater@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) But the raw data of every single American who had flown does exist. The government has a database of every tattoo, mole, and genital of everyone who has ever used an airplane. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago I like to force them to touch me personally. That way I at least get something out of this bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) What's the point of scanning someone at that level of precision if they can't even see it? Seems pretty pointless to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well its intended function is not to generate nonconsensual nudes, but to detect the presence of weapons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 2 points 1 year ago lol, I get that part, but how can they assess the presence of weapons if it's blurred. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 child) But the raw data of every single American who had flown does exist. The government has a database of every tattoo, mole, and genital of everyone who has ever used an airplane. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago I like to force them to touch me personally. That way I at least get something out of this bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago I like to force them to touch me personally. That way I at least get something out of this bullshit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child) What's the point of scanning someone at that level of precision if they can't even see it? Seems pretty pointless to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well its intended function is not to generate nonconsensual nudes, but to detect the presence of weapons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 2 points 1 year ago lol, I get that part, but how can they assess the presence of weapons if it's blurred. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Well its intended function is not to generate nonconsensual nudes, but to detect the presence of weapons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 97xBang@feddit.online 2 points 1 year ago lol, I get that part, but how can they assess the presence of weapons if it's blurred. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 97xBang@feddit.online 2 points 1 year ago lol, I get that part, but how can they assess the presence of weapons if it's blurred. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 1 point 1 year ago Not everyone, but I'd bet the NSA and CIA keep copies permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Shorts covered with quartz sequins would scatter the image enough to blind the scanner. Make sure they're mounted with glue instead of metal mounts, or they'll fail the metal detector. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) what in the fuck would shaving change? you wanna go buffalo bill at the airport knock yourself out, but you dont need an excuse to shave your junk, wild man permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Mickey7@lemmy.world [S] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) You just had to ruin my fun of having an excuse to shave my balls permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago my point is you dont need to be trying to tuck your shit to convince the tsa that you're a chick bro. just shave that shit bro. i havent shaved my garbage for a good long while. as ive gotten older, the ball hair has increased in density, it might be refreshing to go cue-ball. i had a friend (had, as he doesnt talk to me anymore cause he needed to borrow €100 and is always broke so will prolly never pay it back) who was a big evangelist for shaving your shit. he was a bit of a locker room pervert.. anyway he said one time he was shearing his nuts and sliced off like a 2mm section of scrotum skin (not all the way to the vas defferens or anything, just deep into the layers of skin), and he said the blood came out like a ruby red fire suppression sprinkler and he couldnt get it to stop permalink fedilink source parent [–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Do it for the ladies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world [S] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) You just had to ruin my fun of having an excuse to shave my balls permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago my point is you dont need to be trying to tuck your shit to convince the tsa that you're a chick bro. just shave that shit bro. i havent shaved my garbage for a good long while. as ive gotten older, the ball hair has increased in density, it might be refreshing to go cue-ball. i had a friend (had, as he doesnt talk to me anymore cause he needed to borrow €100 and is always broke so will prolly never pay it back) who was a big evangelist for shaving your shit. he was a bit of a locker room pervert.. anyway he said one time he was shearing his nuts and sliced off like a 2mm section of scrotum skin (not all the way to the vas defferens or anything, just deep into the layers of skin), and he said the blood came out like a ruby red fire suppression sprinkler and he couldnt get it to stop permalink fedilink source parent [–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Do it for the ladies. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago my point is you dont need to be trying to tuck your shit to convince the tsa that you're a chick bro. just shave that shit bro. i havent shaved my garbage for a good long while. as ive gotten older, the ball hair has increased in density, it might be refreshing to go cue-ball. i had a friend (had, as he doesnt talk to me anymore cause he needed to borrow €100 and is always broke so will prolly never pay it back) who was a big evangelist for shaving your shit. he was a bit of a locker room pervert.. anyway he said one time he was shearing his nuts and sliced off like a 2mm section of scrotum skin (not all the way to the vas defferens or anything, just deep into the layers of skin), and he said the blood came out like a ruby red fire suppression sprinkler and he couldnt get it to stop permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago Do it for the ladies. permalink fedilink source parent