▲ 336 ▼ South Korean teachers stage walkout over harassment by parents and students (www.theguardian.com) submitted 2 years ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world 58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] gabe@literature.cafe 56 points 2 years ago (3 children) Holy shit, teacher suicides? What the fuck permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Chozo@kbin.social 34 points 2 years ago (3 children) I'm honestly surprised it's not more common. Especially in the US. I see nothing but horror stories from teachers about how uncontrollable kids have gotten in recent years. Plus videos of teachers being attacked by their students, or just straight to getting shot by them. This generation of kids is causing so much trauma for teachers these days, it's insane. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago (3 children) The issue stems from the generation of the parents, the children are a symptom of their environment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children) Certainly not the systemic underfunding of the education system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) Education is certainly underfunded, but I don't see how you can blame toxic kids and parents on that. Sounds more like a symptom of a couple of generations of atrocious parenting to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago Part of the reason toxic kids and parents exist is because administration doesn't support teachers either. It's an entire system of issues. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bobman@unilem.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Bro, you can 'fund' it as much as possible and children are still going to behave like animals if they don't have any home training. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) just strange I suppose that you don't see this is systems where the education is better funded. granted it might take a few generations to really take hold. but funding education should be obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent [–] bobman@unilem.org 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) Yeah. A lot of the shitty parents had kids at a very young age this generation and we're seeing the repercussions of that. You need to be able to take care of yourself before you can take care of someone else. I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing more kids raised by their grandparents because their actual parents are shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago I’d actually hazard a guess that on average, parents are older these days. I don’t think the issue is really young parents, it’s that parents don’t discipline now. They just shove a screen in front of their kid instead of having a meaningful conversation. Parents now were raised with somewhat instant gratification and it’s even worse with their kids. permalink fedilink source parent [–] QHC@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Is this based on actual statistics of any kind, or just your ass? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago What? People used to have children at 18 (or earlier), most people now are waiting until their 30s if at all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TJmCAwesome@feddit.nu -1 points 2 years ago People have never had kids later than this generation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MossBear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Or kids being raised on the internet. Shit heads teaching kids to behave like shit heads. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* My GF's daughter is asking some of her teachers if she can put a voice recorder up front to record the teacher so she could learn. Because the students talk to each other over the teachers and literally curse out the teachers when they try to maintain order. I was shocked - 30 years ago, sure there were a couple of bad apples in some classes, but they'd get ejected if they failed to shut the fuck up after being told to shut the fuck up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bobman@unilem.org 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I personally think teachers in that environment should work together and open up their own schools. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) How does that solve the problem with unruly children? It just puts them in a new school with more liability than when they were just teachers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobman@unilem.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sorry, I meant to imply that this school run by them would have the authority to pick and choose who gets to attend. The unruly children would simply be barred. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ehhh, there’s a lot of liability in picking a choosing who can attend. Ripe for a discrimination lawsuit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Private schools can't discriminate against protected classes but they can ABSOLUTELY use behavior as selection criteria. That said, sometimes what it takes is a totally different approach to discipline to reach "problem students," approaches that aren't often available in the public school context. Some respond well to iron-fisted authority, some respond well to restorative practices and circles, etc., while some need a ton of personal attention. Some "problem students" have problem parents, some don't. It's a shame that our public education system is as underfunded as it is, that school boards are political, that our public system is, by-and-large, one-size fits all. Charter schools and magnet schools provide some free public alternatives, but most progressives label them as destroying public school funding (at least, until they realize, like I did, that where I live, the standard public school system is a political shitshow and that sending my kid there would lead to conservative indoctrination). My local charter is chock full of incredibly passionate teachers that have an expansive view of the world. Of course I'd sign my kid up for their lottery. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago They do. They're called Charter Schools, and letting folks online know that you're going to send your kid to one is a great way to get downvoted. I have no interest in sending my kid to a rural public school system that is leading the charge against "woke," whatever that is. permalink fedilink source parent [–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago bullies suck permalink fedilink source parent [–] ComplexDonut@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago I recommend the movie The Garden of Words permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chozo@kbin.social 34 points 2 years ago (3 children) I'm honestly surprised it's not more common. Especially in the US. I see nothing but horror stories from teachers about how uncontrollable kids have gotten in recent years. Plus videos of teachers being attacked by their students, or just straight to getting shot by them. This generation of kids is causing so much trauma for teachers these days, it's insane. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago (3 children) The issue stems from the generation of the parents, the children are a symptom of their environment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children) Certainly not the systemic underfunding of the education system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) Education is certainly underfunded, but I don't see how you can blame toxic kids and parents on that. Sounds more like a symptom of a couple of generations of atrocious parenting to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago Part of the reason toxic kids and parents exist is because administration doesn't support teachers either. It's an entire system of issues. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bobman@unilem.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Bro, you can 'fund' it as much as possible and children are still going to behave like animals if they don't have any home training. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) just strange I suppose that you don't see this is systems where the education is better funded. granted it might take a few generations to really take hold. but funding education should be obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent [–] bobman@unilem.org 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) Yeah. A lot of the shitty parents had kids at a very young age this generation and we're seeing the repercussions of that. You need to be able to take care of yourself before you can take care of someone else. I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing more kids raised by their grandparents because their actual parents are shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago I’d actually hazard a guess that on average, parents are older these days. I don’t think the issue is really young parents, it’s that parents don’t discipline now. They just shove a screen in front of their kid instead of having a meaningful conversation. Parents now were raised with somewhat instant gratification and it’s even worse with their kids. permalink fedilink source parent [–] QHC@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Is this based on actual statistics of any kind, or just your ass? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago What? People used to have children at 18 (or earlier), most people now are waiting until their 30s if at all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TJmCAwesome@feddit.nu -1 points 2 years ago People have never had kids later than this generation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MossBear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Or kids being raised on the internet. Shit heads teaching kids to behave like shit heads. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* My GF's daughter is asking some of her teachers if she can put a voice recorder up front to record the teacher so she could learn. Because the students talk to each other over the teachers and literally curse out the teachers when they try to maintain order. I was shocked - 30 years ago, sure there were a couple of bad apples in some classes, but they'd get ejected if they failed to shut the fuck up after being told to shut the fuck up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bobman@unilem.org 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I personally think teachers in that environment should work together and open up their own schools. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) How does that solve the problem with unruly children? It just puts them in a new school with more liability than when they were just teachers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobman@unilem.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sorry, I meant to imply that this school run by them would have the authority to pick and choose who gets to attend. The unruly children would simply be barred. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ehhh, there’s a lot of liability in picking a choosing who can attend. Ripe for a discrimination lawsuit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Private schools can't discriminate against protected classes but they can ABSOLUTELY use behavior as selection criteria. That said, sometimes what it takes is a totally different approach to discipline to reach "problem students," approaches that aren't often available in the public school context. Some respond well to iron-fisted authority, some respond well to restorative practices and circles, etc., while some need a ton of personal attention. Some "problem students" have problem parents, some don't. It's a shame that our public education system is as underfunded as it is, that school boards are political, that our public system is, by-and-large, one-size fits all. Charter schools and magnet schools provide some free public alternatives, but most progressives label them as destroying public school funding (at least, until they realize, like I did, that where I live, the standard public school system is a political shitshow and that sending my kid there would lead to conservative indoctrination). My local charter is chock full of incredibly passionate teachers that have an expansive view of the world. Of course I'd sign my kid up for their lottery. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago They do. They're called Charter Schools, and letting folks online know that you're going to send your kid to one is a great way to get downvoted. I have no interest in sending my kid to a rural public school system that is leading the charge against "woke," whatever that is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago (3 children) The issue stems from the generation of the parents, the children are a symptom of their environment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children) Certainly not the systemic underfunding of the education system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) Education is certainly underfunded, but I don't see how you can blame toxic kids and parents on that. Sounds more like a symptom of a couple of generations of atrocious parenting to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago Part of the reason toxic kids and parents exist is because administration doesn't support teachers either. It's an entire system of issues. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bobman@unilem.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Bro, you can 'fund' it as much as possible and children are still going to behave like animals if they don't have any home training. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) just strange I suppose that you don't see this is systems where the education is better funded. granted it might take a few generations to really take hold. but funding education should be obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent [–] bobman@unilem.org 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) Yeah. A lot of the shitty parents had kids at a very young age this generation and we're seeing the repercussions of that. You need to be able to take care of yourself before you can take care of someone else. I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing more kids raised by their grandparents because their actual parents are shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago I’d actually hazard a guess that on average, parents are older these days. I don’t think the issue is really young parents, it’s that parents don’t discipline now. They just shove a screen in front of their kid instead of having a meaningful conversation. Parents now were raised with somewhat instant gratification and it’s even worse with their kids. permalink fedilink source parent [–] QHC@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Is this based on actual statistics of any kind, or just your ass? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago What? People used to have children at 18 (or earlier), most people now are waiting until their 30s if at all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TJmCAwesome@feddit.nu -1 points 2 years ago People have never had kids later than this generation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MossBear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Or kids being raised on the internet. Shit heads teaching kids to behave like shit heads. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children) Certainly not the systemic underfunding of the education system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) Education is certainly underfunded, but I don't see how you can blame toxic kids and parents on that. Sounds more like a symptom of a couple of generations of atrocious parenting to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago Part of the reason toxic kids and parents exist is because administration doesn't support teachers either. It's an entire system of issues. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bobman@unilem.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Bro, you can 'fund' it as much as possible and children are still going to behave like animals if they don't have any home training. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) just strange I suppose that you don't see this is systems where the education is better funded. granted it might take a few generations to really take hold. but funding education should be obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 child) Education is certainly underfunded, but I don't see how you can blame toxic kids and parents on that. Sounds more like a symptom of a couple of generations of atrocious parenting to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago Part of the reason toxic kids and parents exist is because administration doesn't support teachers either. It's an entire system of issues. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EssentialCoffee@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago Part of the reason toxic kids and parents exist is because administration doesn't support teachers either. It's an entire system of issues. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bobman@unilem.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) Bro, you can 'fund' it as much as possible and children are still going to behave like animals if they don't have any home training. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) just strange I suppose that you don't see this is systems where the education is better funded. granted it might take a few generations to really take hold. but funding education should be obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) just strange I suppose that you don't see this is systems where the education is better funded. granted it might take a few generations to really take hold. but funding education should be obvious. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) deleted by creator permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bobman@unilem.org 2 points 2 years ago (4 children) Yeah. A lot of the shitty parents had kids at a very young age this generation and we're seeing the repercussions of that. You need to be able to take care of yourself before you can take care of someone else. I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing more kids raised by their grandparents because their actual parents are shit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago I’d actually hazard a guess that on average, parents are older these days. I don’t think the issue is really young parents, it’s that parents don’t discipline now. They just shove a screen in front of their kid instead of having a meaningful conversation. Parents now were raised with somewhat instant gratification and it’s even worse with their kids. permalink fedilink source parent [–] QHC@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Is this based on actual statistics of any kind, or just your ass? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago What? People used to have children at 18 (or earlier), most people now are waiting until their 30s if at all. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TJmCAwesome@feddit.nu -1 points 2 years ago People have never had kids later than this generation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago I’d actually hazard a guess that on average, parents are older these days. I don’t think the issue is really young parents, it’s that parents don’t discipline now. They just shove a screen in front of their kid instead of having a meaningful conversation. Parents now were raised with somewhat instant gratification and it’s even worse with their kids. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QHC@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago Is this based on actual statistics of any kind, or just your ass? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago What? People used to have children at 18 (or earlier), most people now are waiting until their 30s if at all. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TJmCAwesome@feddit.nu -1 points 2 years ago People have never had kids later than this generation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MossBear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Or kids being raised on the internet. Shit heads teaching kids to behave like shit heads. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* My GF's daughter is asking some of her teachers if she can put a voice recorder up front to record the teacher so she could learn. Because the students talk to each other over the teachers and literally curse out the teachers when they try to maintain order. I was shocked - 30 years ago, sure there were a couple of bad apples in some classes, but they'd get ejected if they failed to shut the fuck up after being told to shut the fuck up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bobman@unilem.org 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) I personally think teachers in that environment should work together and open up their own schools. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) How does that solve the problem with unruly children? It just puts them in a new school with more liability than when they were just teachers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobman@unilem.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sorry, I meant to imply that this school run by them would have the authority to pick and choose who gets to attend. The unruly children would simply be barred. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ehhh, there’s a lot of liability in picking a choosing who can attend. Ripe for a discrimination lawsuit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Private schools can't discriminate against protected classes but they can ABSOLUTELY use behavior as selection criteria. That said, sometimes what it takes is a totally different approach to discipline to reach "problem students," approaches that aren't often available in the public school context. Some respond well to iron-fisted authority, some respond well to restorative practices and circles, etc., while some need a ton of personal attention. Some "problem students" have problem parents, some don't. It's a shame that our public education system is as underfunded as it is, that school boards are political, that our public system is, by-and-large, one-size fits all. Charter schools and magnet schools provide some free public alternatives, but most progressives label them as destroying public school funding (at least, until they realize, like I did, that where I live, the standard public school system is a political shitshow and that sending my kid there would lead to conservative indoctrination). My local charter is chock full of incredibly passionate teachers that have an expansive view of the world. Of course I'd sign my kid up for their lottery. permalink fedilink source parent [–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago They do. They're called Charter Schools, and letting folks online know that you're going to send your kid to one is a great way to get downvoted. I have no interest in sending my kid to a rural public school system that is leading the charge against "woke," whatever that is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) How does that solve the problem with unruly children? It just puts them in a new school with more liability than when they were just teachers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bobman@unilem.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sorry, I meant to imply that this school run by them would have the authority to pick and choose who gets to attend. The unruly children would simply be barred. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ehhh, there’s a lot of liability in picking a choosing who can attend. Ripe for a discrimination lawsuit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Private schools can't discriminate against protected classes but they can ABSOLUTELY use behavior as selection criteria. That said, sometimes what it takes is a totally different approach to discipline to reach "problem students," approaches that aren't often available in the public school context. Some respond well to iron-fisted authority, some respond well to restorative practices and circles, etc., while some need a ton of personal attention. Some "problem students" have problem parents, some don't. It's a shame that our public education system is as underfunded as it is, that school boards are political, that our public system is, by-and-large, one-size fits all. Charter schools and magnet schools provide some free public alternatives, but most progressives label them as destroying public school funding (at least, until they realize, like I did, that where I live, the standard public school system is a political shitshow and that sending my kid there would lead to conservative indoctrination). My local charter is chock full of incredibly passionate teachers that have an expansive view of the world. Of course I'd sign my kid up for their lottery. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bobman@unilem.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Sorry, I meant to imply that this school run by them would have the authority to pick and choose who gets to attend. The unruly children would simply be barred. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ehhh, there’s a lot of liability in picking a choosing who can attend. Ripe for a discrimination lawsuit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Private schools can't discriminate against protected classes but they can ABSOLUTELY use behavior as selection criteria. That said, sometimes what it takes is a totally different approach to discipline to reach "problem students," approaches that aren't often available in the public school context. Some respond well to iron-fisted authority, some respond well to restorative practices and circles, etc., while some need a ton of personal attention. Some "problem students" have problem parents, some don't. It's a shame that our public education system is as underfunded as it is, that school boards are political, that our public system is, by-and-large, one-size fits all. Charter schools and magnet schools provide some free public alternatives, but most progressives label them as destroying public school funding (at least, until they realize, like I did, that where I live, the standard public school system is a political shitshow and that sending my kid there would lead to conservative indoctrination). My local charter is chock full of incredibly passionate teachers that have an expansive view of the world. Of course I'd sign my kid up for their lottery. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MaybeItWorks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ehhh, there’s a lot of liability in picking a choosing who can attend. Ripe for a discrimination lawsuit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Private schools can't discriminate against protected classes but they can ABSOLUTELY use behavior as selection criteria. That said, sometimes what it takes is a totally different approach to discipline to reach "problem students," approaches that aren't often available in the public school context. Some respond well to iron-fisted authority, some respond well to restorative practices and circles, etc., while some need a ton of personal attention. Some "problem students" have problem parents, some don't. It's a shame that our public education system is as underfunded as it is, that school boards are political, that our public system is, by-and-large, one-size fits all. Charter schools and magnet schools provide some free public alternatives, but most progressives label them as destroying public school funding (at least, until they realize, like I did, that where I live, the standard public school system is a political shitshow and that sending my kid there would lead to conservative indoctrination). My local charter is chock full of incredibly passionate teachers that have an expansive view of the world. Of course I'd sign my kid up for their lottery. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Private schools can't discriminate against protected classes but they can ABSOLUTELY use behavior as selection criteria. That said, sometimes what it takes is a totally different approach to discipline to reach "problem students," approaches that aren't often available in the public school context. Some respond well to iron-fisted authority, some respond well to restorative practices and circles, etc., while some need a ton of personal attention. Some "problem students" have problem parents, some don't. It's a shame that our public education system is as underfunded as it is, that school boards are political, that our public system is, by-and-large, one-size fits all. Charter schools and magnet schools provide some free public alternatives, but most progressives label them as destroying public school funding (at least, until they realize, like I did, that where I live, the standard public school system is a political shitshow and that sending my kid there would lead to conservative indoctrination). My local charter is chock full of incredibly passionate teachers that have an expansive view of the world. Of course I'd sign my kid up for their lottery. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago They do. They're called Charter Schools, and letting folks online know that you're going to send your kid to one is a great way to get downvoted. I have no interest in sending my kid to a rural public school system that is leading the charge against "woke," whatever that is. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ComplexDonut@aussie.zone 4 points 2 years ago I recommend the movie The Garden of Words permalink fedilink source parent