460
Meta’s Moderation Modifications Mean Anti-LGBTQ Speech Is Welcome, While Pro-LGBTQ Speech Is Not (www.techdirt.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I didn’t say you wouldn’t be at a massive disadvantage but they didn’t have functional moderation before and they’re not going to pay for it now. What’s being suggested as an alternative is flat out giving up.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    What’s being suggested as an alternative is flat out giving up.

    No it's not, it's simply not spending our time on a private companies property. Literally the Civil Rights era was bolstered by massive success of boycotts. It wasn't giving up, it was hitting them in the pocketbook and it worked.

    But you can make any excuses for yourself that you need to keep sucking down that corporate slop.

    I don't know how to reiterate that you can still talk to people in other places like Facebook, the fact that you treat it like it's the only way to communicate with people says a lot about you and how you view the internet. It's naive, imho.

    What if people like you had convinced Martin Luther King Jr. that the Montgomery Bus Boycott was "giving up" because they "weren't using the buses."

    https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/montgomery-bus-boycott

    On 5 December, 90 percent of Montgomery’s black citizens stayed off the buses. That afternoon, the city’s ministers and leaders met to discuss the possibility of extending the boycott into a long-term campaign. During this meeting the MIA was formed, and King was elected president. Parks recalled: “The advantage of having Dr. King as president was that he was so new to Montgomery and to civil rights work that he hadn’t been there long enough to make any strong friends or enemies”

    Finally, and most importantly, you talk about breaking rules, but you haven't even given one example of how you can do that effectively to help people. I might believe you if you were coming correct with examples, but you aren't so I can only assume this is some foolhardy desire to do good but you have no fucking clue how. The how is the hard part, buddy, and it doesn't come from giving in to corporate slop and giving them the money they need to keep fucking you over.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Okay. I’ll leave those patient support groups because you told me to cut contact with people using corpo media. You might not be interested in boring reasons people do what they do but that’s why common people don’t believe in honesty when you tell them you have their best interest at heart. This suggests that you only care about what’s good for people superficially and people can smell that a mile away, hence current popularity of liberal left.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Unlike yourself, I cultivated relationships with those kind of people outside Facebook, got their phone numbers, and am able to be part of a support network for them without needing to use Facebook.

    but keep making excuses for yourself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Unlike you people I have to connect with people with a rare disease and I don’t have a choice. Ride that high horse cowboy, it feels good for a time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Buddy I'm literally living with cancer. Check my post history, I'm not shy about mentioning it, it's Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. The most stressful part of it is living in the US and running the risk of losing access to a medication that costs $18k a month. It may not be rare but that doesn't make it any less of a bitch to live with.

    There's literally a good chance that if Trump is successful in repealing the ACA, that I won't be able to come up with a way to afford it, and I will die a horrifically painful and totally preventable death within the next year of it being repealed.

    I'm part of several support groups, none of which use Meta services to connect.

    Keep on making excuses for yourself man.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Not sure what’s your point really, disability olympics where we argue who has it worse? You’re advocating for people who are already disadvantaged to disadvantage themselves on purpose even more for your holy war. I’m fairly sure you have very little idea of regional context (like there’s a world outside of US) which makes this even more out of touch.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Dude, you're the one who talked about breaking rules like a fucking hero ("Break rules and fight back.") and then was like "oh poor me I need to support people with a rare disease," as if breaking the rules to get a point across won't get your account banned. Pick a lane, either you want to stand up for people on there and spread messages about the LGBT+ community being vilified (which will get you banned) or you want to be there to be a support network for people with a rare disease (which means you can't fuck around and get banned). You started and ended with two entirely contradictory positions. One is behavior that will get you banned, the other is stuff that you really don't want to get banned to stay involved with, you don't get to have both on Meta. Breaking rules and fighting back will literally get you banned and then oh boo hoo hoo you won't be able to help your support groups.

    Finally, you switched gears and you brought up the disability olympics to someone who is literally suffering and still manages to support others witout using Meta. ("Unlike you people I have to connect with people with a rare disease and I don’t have a choice.") I responded because it's a pathetic excuse to keep sucking down Meta' s slop and the assumptive position of "unlike you" shows you are able and willing to assume things about others without knowledge of their actual situation, just because what they said upset you somehow. Shocker that when your assumption is flat out wrong that someone will take the time to respond. Take a look in the mirror.

    You're only back because your bid to end the conversation and make yourself look superior because you're "helping people" when you're actually just lining Zuck's pockets is a joke. You don't look like you're helping people when I'm doing the same shit without Meta, and so you needed to come back and "prove" you're right... again. (Which you failed because you're actually offering two entirely contradictory positions: break rules and fight back versus stay to help those in need.)

    Like why do you have such a hardon for being a Facebook hero? Let it go, man. You even describe in sensationalist terms that what I'm doing is a "holy war." All I'm doing is saying we're never going to make headway by thinking we have a voice in an authoritarian state, which is what Meta's servers are. Sounds to me like you're waging a "holy war" to make sure Zuck doesn't lose a penny of his precious billions. Next you'll tell me it's really important to watch FOX News, too, for the same reasons somehow.

    PS I know Europe uses the hell out of WhatsApp. People are fucking idiots who like to use things that are easy to use but also easy to exploit them with. WhatsApp should have never been trusted once it was bought by Meta. It's not my fault people keep making bad decisions because its "easier."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent