▲ 67 ▼ If You Were Unemployed, But Had A Hefty Savings Of 10K, In What Ways Would You Approach Your Job Search Differently? (lemdit.com) submitted 2 years ago by PrettyBlackDress@lemdit.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world 130 comments fedilink hide all child comments The point is not to chill and just burn through the savings and not work. How would having that much money saved, change the way you look for jobs?
[–] Magister@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) There are people earning 10k/month who are living paycheck to paycheck, so for them 10k saving is just one month permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago Yes, exactly this permalink fedilink source parent [+] regalia@literature.cafe -8 points 2 years ago (3 children) Bruh these people absolutely have the option to scale back, don't feel bad for them. They live paycheck to paycheck after their $80k car payments and $600k house mortgage. That's not the same. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) Or maybe they have a family with kids, they live in an expensive part of town, but moving is not an option due to job constraints, or maybe the kids are going to school there and moving would be disruptive. Maybe that area didn't use to be so expensive 10 years ago. They need cars, not 80k cars, but large enough to haul said family around, cause maybe public transportation sucks where they live. Heck, maybe they bought those cars in cash, no payments, but gas, insurance & maintenance (maybe they're old cars) are killing them. Car prices are too expensive to get a new car, so they keep spending 1000s in repairs instead. Maybe a hurricane, strong winds or just normal wear and tear made their house roof leak, thats $20k right there, ask me how I know. Also, a 600k house is cheap and almost impossible to find in California, for example. No, moving to Texas is not an option, thanks. Edit: the example above is hypothetical, not my current situation, but based on my experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) There is no definition of being wealthy that does not include people that make $120k/year. You are richer than 80% of the country at that point. Lots of people have families in high COL cities and live on significantly less money than that. https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/household-income-quintiles Maybe a hurricane, strong winds or just normal wear and tear made their house roof leak, thats $20k right there, ask me how I know. I literally spent $24k on home repairs this summer, and I just pay it in payments, and I make 6 figures. No normal person pays this in cash, outright. My roof replacement a few years back was $8k covered by home insurance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There is no set amount of USD that defines the line between "wealthy" and "poor". Your $120k figure would go a lot further in Mississippi or Texas that it would go in California or Massachusetts, where that would be barely enough for a large family. There's definitely a place (or two) in the US where a family struggles with $120k/yr. Sure, just move to Mississippi, I guess ... Lots of people have families in high COL cities and live on significantly less money than that. They would be considered "poor" there, or at least not wealthy. I literally spent $24k on home repairs this summer, and I just pay it in payments, and I make 6 figures. Well good for you, I guess. No normal person pays this in cash, outright. I guess I'm not normal. My roof replacement a few years back was $8k Good for you, that would get you half a roof here, and insurance won't cover if it's considered normal wear and tear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago No you are definitely not normal and that is the entire duscussion permalink fedilink source parent [–] regalia@literature.cafe -4 points 2 years ago Those are all things you can scale back on. People who make less certainly are forced to. Not that they're not entitled to live there, my point is I don't feel bad at all that they're claiming to live paycheck to paycheck, because they have the option to not be. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago For some of us, that mortgage is the cheap option. My payment is well under rent for a 2br in my town, plus I have an outstanding interest rate permalink fedilink source parent [–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Check out the crabs in the bucket permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] regalia@literature.cafe 1 point 2 years ago It's not bringing people down, it's not having pity for them. Maybe you misread the comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] regalia@literature.cafe -8 points 2 years ago (3 children) Bruh these people absolutely have the option to scale back, don't feel bad for them. They live paycheck to paycheck after their $80k car payments and $600k house mortgage. That's not the same. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) Or maybe they have a family with kids, they live in an expensive part of town, but moving is not an option due to job constraints, or maybe the kids are going to school there and moving would be disruptive. Maybe that area didn't use to be so expensive 10 years ago. They need cars, not 80k cars, but large enough to haul said family around, cause maybe public transportation sucks where they live. Heck, maybe they bought those cars in cash, no payments, but gas, insurance & maintenance (maybe they're old cars) are killing them. Car prices are too expensive to get a new car, so they keep spending 1000s in repairs instead. Maybe a hurricane, strong winds or just normal wear and tear made their house roof leak, thats $20k right there, ask me how I know. Also, a 600k house is cheap and almost impossible to find in California, for example. No, moving to Texas is not an option, thanks. Edit: the example above is hypothetical, not my current situation, but based on my experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) There is no definition of being wealthy that does not include people that make $120k/year. You are richer than 80% of the country at that point. Lots of people have families in high COL cities and live on significantly less money than that. https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/household-income-quintiles Maybe a hurricane, strong winds or just normal wear and tear made their house roof leak, thats $20k right there, ask me how I know. I literally spent $24k on home repairs this summer, and I just pay it in payments, and I make 6 figures. No normal person pays this in cash, outright. My roof replacement a few years back was $8k covered by home insurance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There is no set amount of USD that defines the line between "wealthy" and "poor". Your $120k figure would go a lot further in Mississippi or Texas that it would go in California or Massachusetts, where that would be barely enough for a large family. There's definitely a place (or two) in the US where a family struggles with $120k/yr. Sure, just move to Mississippi, I guess ... Lots of people have families in high COL cities and live on significantly less money than that. They would be considered "poor" there, or at least not wealthy. I literally spent $24k on home repairs this summer, and I just pay it in payments, and I make 6 figures. Well good for you, I guess. No normal person pays this in cash, outright. I guess I'm not normal. My roof replacement a few years back was $8k Good for you, that would get you half a roof here, and insurance won't cover if it's considered normal wear and tear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago No you are definitely not normal and that is the entire duscussion permalink fedilink source parent [–] regalia@literature.cafe -4 points 2 years ago Those are all things you can scale back on. People who make less certainly are forced to. Not that they're not entitled to live there, my point is I don't feel bad at all that they're claiming to live paycheck to paycheck, because they have the option to not be. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago For some of us, that mortgage is the cheap option. My payment is well under rent for a 2br in my town, plus I have an outstanding interest rate permalink fedilink source parent [–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Check out the crabs in the bucket permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] regalia@literature.cafe 1 point 2 years ago It's not bringing people down, it's not having pity for them. Maybe you misread the comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) Or maybe they have a family with kids, they live in an expensive part of town, but moving is not an option due to job constraints, or maybe the kids are going to school there and moving would be disruptive. Maybe that area didn't use to be so expensive 10 years ago. They need cars, not 80k cars, but large enough to haul said family around, cause maybe public transportation sucks where they live. Heck, maybe they bought those cars in cash, no payments, but gas, insurance & maintenance (maybe they're old cars) are killing them. Car prices are too expensive to get a new car, so they keep spending 1000s in repairs instead. Maybe a hurricane, strong winds or just normal wear and tear made their house roof leak, thats $20k right there, ask me how I know. Also, a 600k house is cheap and almost impossible to find in California, for example. No, moving to Texas is not an option, thanks. Edit: the example above is hypothetical, not my current situation, but based on my experience. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) There is no definition of being wealthy that does not include people that make $120k/year. You are richer than 80% of the country at that point. Lots of people have families in high COL cities and live on significantly less money than that. https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/household-income-quintiles Maybe a hurricane, strong winds or just normal wear and tear made their house roof leak, thats $20k right there, ask me how I know. I literally spent $24k on home repairs this summer, and I just pay it in payments, and I make 6 figures. No normal person pays this in cash, outright. My roof replacement a few years back was $8k covered by home insurance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There is no set amount of USD that defines the line between "wealthy" and "poor". Your $120k figure would go a lot further in Mississippi or Texas that it would go in California or Massachusetts, where that would be barely enough for a large family. There's definitely a place (or two) in the US where a family struggles with $120k/yr. Sure, just move to Mississippi, I guess ... Lots of people have families in high COL cities and live on significantly less money than that. They would be considered "poor" there, or at least not wealthy. I literally spent $24k on home repairs this summer, and I just pay it in payments, and I make 6 figures. Well good for you, I guess. No normal person pays this in cash, outright. I guess I'm not normal. My roof replacement a few years back was $8k Good for you, that would get you half a roof here, and insurance won't cover if it's considered normal wear and tear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago No you are definitely not normal and that is the entire duscussion permalink fedilink source parent [–] regalia@literature.cafe -4 points 2 years ago Those are all things you can scale back on. People who make less certainly are forced to. Not that they're not entitled to live there, my point is I don't feel bad at all that they're claiming to live paycheck to paycheck, because they have the option to not be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (1 child) There is no definition of being wealthy that does not include people that make $120k/year. You are richer than 80% of the country at that point. Lots of people have families in high COL cities and live on significantly less money than that. https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/statistics/household-income-quintiles Maybe a hurricane, strong winds or just normal wear and tear made their house roof leak, thats $20k right there, ask me how I know. I literally spent $24k on home repairs this summer, and I just pay it in payments, and I make 6 figures. No normal person pays this in cash, outright. My roof replacement a few years back was $8k covered by home insurance. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There is no set amount of USD that defines the line between "wealthy" and "poor". Your $120k figure would go a lot further in Mississippi or Texas that it would go in California or Massachusetts, where that would be barely enough for a large family. There's definitely a place (or two) in the US where a family struggles with $120k/yr. Sure, just move to Mississippi, I guess ... Lots of people have families in high COL cities and live on significantly less money than that. They would be considered "poor" there, or at least not wealthy. I literally spent $24k on home repairs this summer, and I just pay it in payments, and I make 6 figures. Well good for you, I guess. No normal person pays this in cash, outright. I guess I'm not normal. My roof replacement a few years back was $8k Good for you, that would get you half a roof here, and insurance won't cover if it's considered normal wear and tear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago No you are definitely not normal and that is the entire duscussion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) There is no set amount of USD that defines the line between "wealthy" and "poor". Your $120k figure would go a lot further in Mississippi or Texas that it would go in California or Massachusetts, where that would be barely enough for a large family. There's definitely a place (or two) in the US where a family struggles with $120k/yr. Sure, just move to Mississippi, I guess ... Lots of people have families in high COL cities and live on significantly less money than that. They would be considered "poor" there, or at least not wealthy. I literally spent $24k on home repairs this summer, and I just pay it in payments, and I make 6 figures. Well good for you, I guess. No normal person pays this in cash, outright. I guess I'm not normal. My roof replacement a few years back was $8k Good for you, that would get you half a roof here, and insurance won't cover if it's considered normal wear and tear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago No you are definitely not normal and that is the entire duscussion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago No you are definitely not normal and that is the entire duscussion permalink fedilink source parent
[–] regalia@literature.cafe -4 points 2 years ago Those are all things you can scale back on. People who make less certainly are forced to. Not that they're not entitled to live there, my point is I don't feel bad at all that they're claiming to live paycheck to paycheck, because they have the option to not be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago For some of us, that mortgage is the cheap option. My payment is well under rent for a 2br in my town, plus I have an outstanding interest rate permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Check out the crabs in the bucket permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] regalia@literature.cafe 1 point 2 years ago It's not bringing people down, it's not having pity for them. Maybe you misread the comment. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] regalia@literature.cafe 1 point 2 years ago It's not bringing people down, it's not having pity for them. Maybe you misread the comment. permalink fedilink source parent