Just curious how many of you are cool with this deeply racist image being the header for one of your comms

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 63 points 2 years ago (2 children)

the joke is that the authoritarian dictator of china has outlawed depictions of whiney the poo after chinease people started saying he looked like the character.

Wow, that is a joke. It's not a very good joke. Who came up with it?

(That literally never happened)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 80 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You are correct, that's a shit source. They've lied alot in the past, apologies for my failure here.

    Here are some better sources: https://www.axios.com/2020/01/23/china-arrests-university-minnesota-twitter

    https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/china-student-arrested-xi-jinping/

    https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-china-blog-40627855

    You truly have epicly owned me, with facts, and logic even.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago*

    image in question

    Ah, so this is the person you're referring to. In that case, yeah his arrest was warranted. It turns out you can't just spread fatphobic and racist imagery around in American social media networks and not expect to eat shit.

    Posting three of the same headline piece is also meaningless, all three of them are obvious western sources. Your first post of RFA also ruined your credibility. We don't overlook that.

    The CPC take measures to prevent reactionary content from being proliferated. This is normal for a country.

    He was also only sentenced to 6 months, hardly life shattering. Meanwhile rabid disinformation campaigns in the US are facilitated or outright encouraged by standing political officials.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    You can refer to the picture in iridaniotter’s comment for evidence countering the assertion that Winnie the Pooh is not depicted within China in any capacity. As for your claims about Luo Daiqing, the Axios article cites a court document that is written entirely in Mandarin and a Twitter account that has been suspended, while the article on the Daily Dot relies on the Axios piece, so unless you’re able to read Mandarin, you posted a source who’s validity you and most other people here have no way of confirming because it validated what you already believed.

    For the record, I am assuming that Luo was arrested and sentenced for the reason Axios alleges they were out of good faith, but your apparent inability to vet the sources you link, which is evidenced by both what I talked about above and the fact that you initially posted nothing but an almost comically transparent propaganda piece, is troubling nonetheless

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    You are correct, that's a shit source. They've lied alot in the past, apologies for my failure here.

    Here are some better sources: https://www.axios.com/2020/01/23/china-arrests-university-minnesota-twitter

    https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/china-student-arrested-xi-jinping/

    https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-china-blog-40627855

    Thank you for the correction

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    The first two articles are not about a ban on Winnie the Pooh in China which was the subject of the original claim, so I'll put a pin in that.

    Your BBC link isn't really a better source than RFA. Instead of a cutout it's just state media. And what's in that article is just a straight up lie.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Winnie-the-Pooh-really-banned-in-China-or-is-it-Western-propaganda-Could-someone-living-in-China-answer-that-question

    You can talk to actual people in China. They can take photos with their cameras of the displays of licensed Disney products with Winnie the Pooh for sale. The idea that they banned Winnie the Pooh is cold war propaganda. And it can only be maintained in a bubble.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    That is a quora link my dude, and is not a reasonable citation. Just some guy. To claim it's a lie with your proof being a random dude on quora, a site I frequent due to their insane conspiracy theories, nazi delusion and trump dick sucking, and obviously made up stories, is not convincing.

    You are correct though, the concept of winnie the pooh is not fully banned, just in refference to their authoritarian leader. As all critisism of their government is censored, or banned.

    Secondarily, these posts do speak on winnie the pooh.

    From the first article:

    Thirdly, I could give you a million links and they'd always be 'propaganda'. I need you to substantiate that for the BBC. Here's a few more: https://melmagazine.com/en-us/story/winnie-the-pooh-china-ban https://wikiless.org/wiki/Censorship_of_Winnie-the-Pooh_in_China?lang=en https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/18/asia/china-pooh-censor-trnd/index.html https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/07/china-reportedly-bans-disneys-winnie-the-pooh-film-after-xi-compariso.html https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/07/china-bans-winnie-the-pooh-film-to-stop-comparisons-to-president-xi https://www.npr.org/2023/03/23/1165504942/winnie-the-pooh-xi-jinping-china-film https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/south-park-banned-chinese-internet-critical-episode-1245783/

    Lastly, I know many Chinese people, and talk to them frequently about this subject. The issue to you seems to be that I'm talking to the 'wrong' Chinese people. This 'if you just speak to these people' argument is never a convincing one. On either side, Chinese people arguing for or against either of our opinions on the subject does not provide proof for or against. Nearly half of Americans think that Joe Biden is a socialist. I hope we can agree that's dumb

  • source
  • parent