â–² 23 â–¼ Will Europe ease up on big tech? (www.economist.com) submitted 2 years ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.org 31 comments fedilink hide all child comments Paywall? https://archive.is/njhSK
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I still don't get your point, if Lemmy servers have a higher barrier to entry than just doing GDPR, why would GDPR be a barrier to entry for them? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More senseless regulations mean more work and more risk. Also, the enforcement mechanisms are different. So, in terms of corruption, more people get a say in whether you can go ahead. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So the solution to corruption is to not have rules at all? And what "senseless regulations" do you mean? If you want to deal with people's data, you have to respect the people, that's all. You can avoid the whole thing by not collecting people's data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) So the solution to corruption is to not have rules at all? Is it really unthinkable to have rules that are applied equally to all? You can avoid the whole thing by not collecting people’s data. Not true. Besides, some things just don't work otherwise, like lemmy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It is true though. And rules are in fact applied equally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You probably also think that this lemmy instance is compliant. Well, that's why your firm has a professional lawyer. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) More senseless regulations mean more work and more risk. Also, the enforcement mechanisms are different. So, in terms of corruption, more people get a say in whether you can go ahead. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So the solution to corruption is to not have rules at all? And what "senseless regulations" do you mean? If you want to deal with people's data, you have to respect the people, that's all. You can avoid the whole thing by not collecting people's data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) So the solution to corruption is to not have rules at all? Is it really unthinkable to have rules that are applied equally to all? You can avoid the whole thing by not collecting people’s data. Not true. Besides, some things just don't work otherwise, like lemmy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It is true though. And rules are in fact applied equally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You probably also think that this lemmy instance is compliant. Well, that's why your firm has a professional lawyer. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) So the solution to corruption is to not have rules at all? And what "senseless regulations" do you mean? If you want to deal with people's data, you have to respect the people, that's all. You can avoid the whole thing by not collecting people's data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) So the solution to corruption is to not have rules at all? Is it really unthinkable to have rules that are applied equally to all? You can avoid the whole thing by not collecting people’s data. Not true. Besides, some things just don't work otherwise, like lemmy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It is true though. And rules are in fact applied equally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You probably also think that this lemmy instance is compliant. Well, that's why your firm has a professional lawyer. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) So the solution to corruption is to not have rules at all? Is it really unthinkable to have rules that are applied equally to all? You can avoid the whole thing by not collecting people’s data. Not true. Besides, some things just don't work otherwise, like lemmy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It is true though. And rules are in fact applied equally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You probably also think that this lemmy instance is compliant. Well, that's why your firm has a professional lawyer. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) It is true though. And rules are in fact applied equally. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You probably also think that this lemmy instance is compliant. Well, that's why your firm has a professional lawyer. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago You probably also think that this lemmy instance is compliant. Well, that's why your firm has a professional lawyer. permalink fedilink source parent