sorted by: new top controversial old
[niri] my first post <3 gimme some upvotes or I will sudo rm -rf /* in c/unixporn@lemmy.ml
[–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

Mako better than fnott in:

  • better in handling images (thumbnails) than fnott because fnott lags if there's many notifications with high resolution thumbnails that are displayed at once.
  • It has more anchor positions. you cannot have center-right or top-center anchors in Fnott. Fnott has only 5 anchor positions while Mako has 9.
  • You can restore previous expired notifications with makoctl restore command while fnottctl doesn't has it.

Fnott is better than mako in:

  • You have dynamic width so every notification has it is own width instead of all of them have the same width which is the main reason why I use Fnott.
  • Easier to config.
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • [niri] my first post <3 gimme some upvotes or I will sudo rm -rf /* in c/unixporn@lemmy.ml
    49
    [niri] my first post <3 gimme some upvotes or I will sudo rm -rf /* (lemmy.ml)
     

    WM: niri

    distro: arch BTW

    terminal: foot

    notification: fnott made by the same developer of foot

    web browser: qutebrowser

    statusbar: i3bar-river and powered by i3status-rs

    I made my own bash script to randomize wallpapers that took me long time to make. If you want to try it out: randwall

    My dotfiles are not very organized yet that's why I haven't git them for now but I will do soon ....

    [river-classic] Minimal and cozy in c/unixporn@lemmy.ml