[–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

The big perspective shift for me, is not that I feel obliged to privacy in public. It's when the institution observing is so big and centralised that it becomes a power issue. I don't care if you (the people) see all that I do in public, I have nothing to hide. I do care when your agenda is to see everything and gain power from it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    am I just supposed to become even WEIRDER than I am, let all that kinky energy turn toxic and then rapey

    No.

    type for 20 minutes a day about butt sex with an LLM

    You do you, but if it's reinforcing isolation, also maybe no? I sure hope they aren't mutually exclusive though.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 31 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    All very troublesome numbers, but the headline doesn't come back in the article and seems quite overstated. If boys mostly know 100 people their age and they all know that same person in an AI relationship. It's really 0.2% of the agegroup that are in a relationship with AI. Not good, but vastly smaller that the other figures, like creating naked depictions of other people.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    This is the command I used after unlocking the luks device in a rescue environment and confirming it not mounting further:

    sudo btrfs rescue zero-log /dev/mapper/luksroot
    

    After that, I could mount again and boot.

    Here's more info on the command, to verify advice is sound: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/btrfs-progs/btrfs-zero-log.8.en.html#zero

    EDIT: For me it didn't happen during an update, btw. You might still need the chroot approach to make the system bootable again.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    I've had this exact error a couple of weeks ago. You have to clear the replay log (and lose potentially 30 seconds of disk writes). Let's see if I can find exact instructions before the end of my commute.

  • source
  •  

    TLDR; Does anyone know if there's an initiative to use the pdf rendering engines built into most browsers and used while printing a web page in more flexible ways? Ideally from javascript being able to get the pdf as a File.

    I've been looking into download as pdf functionality we implemented at work. It's for a single project, relatively small, so we implemented it with html2pdf.js. There seems to be no better way than rendering the webpage as canvas and saving as an image inside PDF. Although I'm thankful that the project exists, with the lack of text selection, poor image quality and/or large file sizes, it feels bad serving it to the customer. Then I started to look into the printed version and I loved it. Learned some new stuff about css, being able to break a page before a specific element. Tables automatically repeat their header across a page break. I can also save this as pdf, better quality, 40x reduction in file size, yay! However, web api to start this is print(), no arguments, no alternatives. Putting this behind a "Download" buttons seems confusing for the end user. I'm amazed we can't use this built in pdf rendering engine in more flexible ways. (See TLDR for question)

    view more: next ›