[–] 1 point 5 days ago (1 child)

Regarding what "sounds" hot, I think 100 makes more sense as the "super hot" number than 40. Although both numbers are arbitrary, 100 is less arbitrary. (Sorta. We just culturally define 100 to be an important number) Fahrenheit makes more sense if you think of it as "0 feels super cold, 100 feels super hot" although I'll admit it's a little strange that room temperature is 3/4s up the scale. That could be solves with a logarithmic scale, but that would probably be worse than either system.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    I'm asking because the question the other day about silliest characters had a lot of funny comments.

    Personally, I like to play as characters who are perpetually on the brink of fucking things up. Other players adore this, their PCs don't.

    As an example, a week ago, the party was being escorted by a noble to a fort, although the noble was lagging behind. My character (who was a kobold gremlin) announced her presence and demanded to be let in. The guard manning the gate asked how he could be sure that we hadn't killed or kidnapped the noble. My kobold said "Isn't the whole point of kidnapping to announce it and use it as leverage? Why would we be hiding it from you?" The party's 'dad' quickly interjected that we had not kidnapped the noble, and that they were just around the bend. My kobold insisted to be let in, arguing "Just let us in, and if you need to arrest us for killing the noble, you'll have us surrounded." The party dad stared daggers at my character, and asked if she was deliberately trying to fuck things up. (the answer was yes, she had been slighted by the dad who did not let her be a gremlin) The dad asked the games to ignore everything my character had said, and the DM asked us to both do persuasion rolls. The other player rolled a nat one, and I rolled a nat 20. We both said "fuck." At the same time, and he burst out laughing.

    [–] 28 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Instead of spinners, you should use progress bars. When the endpoint of a process is unknown, you should just have a ticker that displays an increasing number. In codex, for example, just show me the number of tokens read or generated so far. It gives me feedback that the process hasn't frozen, and it provides useful information. What an easy and cheap solution!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    It's interesting how girl being raised to be a technomage soldier instilled a tendency for cruelty. Torturing then killing the matabot is kinda fucked up, they're sapient. Although matacorp are clearly bad, I don't think they would stoop to that level. As nasty as they are, they're a corporate entity, and torture is beyond the veil of faux decency they have to adhere to.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Wizard, get off the stage, your health is soft, You need to quaff a potion to cure your cough. Oh, you think your precious little staff can halt the gaffe where everybody looked at you and began to laugh? Old man, take a look at yourself, you're not top shelf, you're lesser than a cobbler's helper elf.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I think there are programming paradigms that haven't even been discovered yet. Rock music was "discovered" centuries after baroque music, and composers back then would have thought baroque music is the ultimate musical genre, which could not have been improved upon.

    I've been working on a programming language recently that sort of programs itself. It's hard to explain how it works, since I approached it from a mathematical direction, but for a domain and range defined with a set of correct input-output pairs, there are an infinite number of functions which correctly maps one input to its corresponding output. If we define f_1 as all functions which correctly map the first IO pair, f_2 as functions which correctly map the second IO pair... Etc etc until we reach f_N, then the set intersection of all f_1...f_N is the set off all functions which satisfy our requirements. From this set of known correct functions, we can sort them by speed or some other trait.

    But the devil's in the details there. I won't go into how I get f_1...f_N, but I'm having fun thinking about it & designing it. It may even be useful some day.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    I don't know if there's a word for it, but 'unconscious multitasking' is the best one I can make up. Basically, when I try to switch tasks, one part of my brain is still focused on the previous task, and the other part is focused on the new task. I can barely think about the new task, and I feel like I'm in a mental fog. The thing is, I can still work on both tasks, just not at 100%. Two different processes are going on in my brain and they are both fighting for the same resources. The other day, I ended up working on two different coding projects at once. One of them was a crazy homebrew AI, and the other was a system which is basically AI dungeon with a background simulation of the world. Every five minutes I'd alt-tab to the other project to write another five lines of code before switching back.

    Historically, I've had similar things happen when I was extremely emotional or in shock. I would sort of split into two thought processes running at the same time. I remember once I was crying because I was having a psychotic-depressive episode, and I was simultaneously having negative thoughts about myself, thinking about how to coordinate these negative thoughts with my wailing, and criticizing myself for being disingenuous for planning my own ability to express my emotions!

    I don't know if this is some AuDHD thing, or just unique to me. I haven't been diagnosed with ADHD, but my brother has it, and a psychiatrist once did an EEG on me and said I had 'similar brainwaves to a person with ADHD.' I don't really have any traditional symptoms of ADHD (inattentiveness, distractibility, hyperactivity, etc.) So I'm wonder if any of you, especially those with AuDHD, have had similar experiences.

    view more: next β€Ί