Oh no! Must be terrible for him.

Anyways...

UEFA seems to have found some balls:

UEFA is accelerating efforts to hold an emergency meeting of its 55 member associations this week, sources told ESPN, to discuss plans, including a potential World Cup boycott.

UEFA said on Tuesday that it takes the plan "extremely seriously" and that it "crosses a line that football's governing institutions should never cross".

The real irony, which I'm sure is lost on Trump, is that Balogun is only able to play for the US due to his birthright citizenship, something the Trump administration is actively trying to get rid of.

Balogun played for England until 2023.

Full circle.

Wow. Ok. I use a different email for my github account, so haven't experienced that.

addy.io has been working great for me for a few years. I've not had them rejected on any site yet. I have the cheapest plan which has been enough for me so far.

Because the businesses won't let us work from home anymore.

Oh, that's an interesting observation. I think it might also be linked to the content consumed on commutes, and in public spaces while on the phone.

Pepfar funding, which had been providing about a fifth of South Africa's total spending on HIV programmes, got a reprieve last October with what was called a "bridge plan".

But a US State Department official has confirmed that a "phased drawdown" of Pepfar funding would now start.

This was because of "South Africa's failure to make demonstrable progress on policy requests by the administration", the official said.

So bizarre.

Making that decision based on disinformation is par for the course for this administration.

That, yes. They had to arrest Durov before he started doing anything about Telegram.

I have no notes on the rest of your points, it will likely be a gigantic shitshow.

I'm thinking they might be using the definition from Digital Services Tax policies, which state that:

The social media definition focuses on two key aspects of user participation. An online service will meet the definition when both of the following conditions are met:

• The main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of the service is to promote interaction between users (including interaction between users and user-generated content).
• Making content generated by users available to other users is a significant feature of the service.

https://www.gov.uk/hmrc-internal-manuals/digital-services-tax/dst14200

If that's the case, then Rumble et al would be banned too. It might just be, that the press release just mentions the most popular ones.

That they don't intend to target messaging platforms like WhatsApp and Signal (and potentially Telegram) is a bit of a greyzone. Telegram is more social network than messaging app these days, where channels are a huge part of the platform. In fact, it's such an important part, that WhatsApp copied the Channel feature to their platform.

I see no mention of Rumble or Telegram. Are they left out on purpose, or because they have no idea what they are doing?