By musks account. By Walter Isaacson's account the opposite was the case. Considering musks opposition to aiding the victim, it would be on brand.

Either you give them land from which they can prepare their next attack or you show them that they're unable to take and hold land. So yeah. Pretty much.

It ends the second russia withdraws its troops or they are beaten out of Ukraine.

Yup. Russia doesn't understand diplomacy. Only force. It's sad that russia acts this way, so, unfortunately, beating them is the only way to have lasting peace.

That or leadership change but I don't think putler fears anything more than losing power and the people are either weak or live in a propaganda bubble.

No. Russia is 100% in the wrong, continously committing crimes against humanity for no justifiable reason at all.

... that, in the pursuit of taking away Ukrainian freedom and independence.

Hence, to actively disrupt their defense is deeply unethical. He chose to do something rather than nothing, and it directly helps those wishing to make the world a worse place. Disgraceful.

Native procedural dark mode, Developer CSS Overview, browser extension file access.

I use Firefox exclusively except for when the second one is useful. I really wish Firefox had those three though.

Phrasing and content are quite different, even if the points end up being the almost the same.

This post "feels" a great deal more relatable, I don't think AI applies, or at least, I'm not familiar with the issue you are outlining.

I'm sure they'd agree wholeheartedly and say nothing to the inverse.

Well, the data it was trained on had a cutoff point in 2021 which would explain that.

I've used it (GPT 3) a fair amount for Unity, and I'm fairly pleased with the results, it's saved me a fair amount of time. Implementing object pooling and editor window dialogues for scene translation management for example.

Of course, programming knowledge is required for it to be of consistent use, which, on second thought, may not be at all obvious.

ChatGPT is GPT 3.5 & GPT 4, as far as I'm aware.

3.5 is also very capable when it comes to programming, for any well known framework or language. It's not as capable, but it is still very capable.

Not everyone with an attention span longer than yours is ChatGPT.

Assuming you've even read THIS far, that comment lacks all of the common gpt hallmarks.