[–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

I don't think you understand what I have said. React.js would be possible without capitalism. But it is made by Facebook (capitalist company). And it must be a really reliable choice if Facebook and Mastodon decided to use it

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Wow. Read the rest of the thread because I'm not gonna rewrite stuff.

    But as I was saying. I live in post communist country and the influence of socialism was extraordinarily destructive and I can see damage made from it to these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    If you seriously compare socialism with opensource then I'm sorry for you.

    I'm huge advocate for opensource software and I can even say it's my life passion and I really know how important the relation between capitalism and opensource is.

    You wouldn't have react.js without capitalism. You know what is made in react.js? Mastodon

    They could have used different library for js. one made totally by volunteers, but they haven't. Why? Capitalism and opensource provide reliable products because there is a money factor and it fuels development

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    In socialism nobody wants to work so good luck with your YouTube. There is a reason for proprietary software being most popular and often more feature rich. What we need is capitalism + more opensource work from us, regular people. Capitalism + opensource is way to go.

  • source
  • parent
  • context