[–] 72 points 2 years ago (7 children)

The library hadn't had any updates in 2 years before this. Clearly it wasn't maintained. If you're a user and bothered by this super edge case "vulnerability", fork it and take on the responsibility yourself.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago*

    Both female and male patients had a lower patient mortality when treated by female physicians; however, the benefit of receiving care from female physicians was larger for female patients than for male patients.

    Of note, the study was conducted on 800k senior citizens.

    The findings may not be generalizable to younger populations.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    No one said anything is beneath senior employees.

    It's a lost opportunity when you, a staff engineer, spend your time doing something that a junior engineer could do -- instead of doing a task a junior engineer can't do.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    It's faulty, short-sighted logic though. If every company trained juniors, only for them to jump ship in two years, there'd be a pool of trained juniors to hire from. Yes you wouldn't get your investment out of that particular person, but you'd be hiring someone else's investment.

    Beyond that, there's work that is better suited to more junior employees because it's literally a waste of the senior employees' skills.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    Too many industries are shitting on entry level employees now.. They're easy targets for layoffs and easy targets for AI, apparently. Now they're already complaining about the lack of quality talent.

    The Great Resignation is effectively over. We’re now in the Great Talent Stagnation, where employers’ biggest concern is the lack of qualified applicants

    If you don't invest in the next set of entry-level employees, you won't have the next set of qualified employees.

  • source
  • view more: next ›