[–] 1 point 1 day ago

As a bottom I can give you one rule: penetrative sex of any kind is not supposed to be painful.

If it is then there's usually a diagnosable problem to fix. It's not always physical it can be really spiritual. I struggle with bottoming usually because I need to like the person I'm with enough to relax, it's called being demi-sexual.

I feel like tops of any sexuality don't really grok how intense of an experience it is to let someone into your own body such that when they're in they don't know how to respect what's in there. Sometimes it does get so intense that it comes out of your voice, sometimes for me at least it gets too intense and I'm not sure if it feels good or bad so I need my top to slow down and let me figure out how things got rearranged.

Lastly, porn recorded by total nobodys on a webcam or iPhone is just barely grazing the boundary of reality. So if you're not vocal, you don't scream, then you just don't like that just not you.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    I feel like the laws of thermodynamics say that the human population would have to eat something else to bring nutrients into the cannibalistic system otherwise we'd all just eat each other.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I guess that's kind of what I was trying to press with the example I was giving.

    I don't need external validation, because I've never had it.. it's like you can live your whole life without adding spices to your food and you could just know what tastes good.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] [S] -16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I don't see how it would happen. Nix is immune bc hashes are constantly checked, you can't swap in malicious code without a person noticing bc it might throw a mismatched hash error. Also nixpkgs has been really good about vetting packages, I don't expect them to look too closely into the source codes of everything but if something malicious were to happen like what is happening to AUR someone would see it way faster

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    I’ve been working on an open-source project called Userless (https://github.com/danhab99/userless), and I’ve reached a point where the codebase has officially outgrown me. Working as a solo dev has gotten overwhelming and lonely, and I’m looking for collaborators—and honestly, friends—who want to help me shape this vision.

    The Core Idea: Redefining the Internet Protocol

    The internet is broken when it comes to how content creators and moderators interact. Right now, platforms have total monopoly over your data. If a moderator or a platform doesn't like what you say, they delete your post, and it ceases to exist.

    I looked at basic internet protocols and thought: the relationship between creators and moderators needs to be entirely different.

    Userless is built on two core principles:

    1. Creators own their content entirely. Period.
    2. Moderators have the right to exclude content. If a moderator doesn't want to host or display certain content on their node or community, they shouldn't have to.

    But just because a moderator doesn't like your content doesn't mean it shouldn't exist anymore.

    By separating ownership from hosting/curation, we can create a web where communities can self-moderate without silencing creators or destroying their digital footprints.

    There's a tonne more I can talk about it but the AI's recommended I shorten this.

    Why I need your help:

    I’ve laid down the initial code, but it has gotten away from me. I’m losing my mental map of the project, and I really need people to jump in, help me organize it, and brainstorm the roadmap.

    Whether you’re a protocol nerd, a backend engineer, or just someone who cares deeply about digital ownership and the future of the web, I’d love to have you.

    Check out the repo here: https://github.com/danhab99/userless

    Drop a comment, shoot me a PM, or open an issue if you want to chat, look at the code together. Let's build a better internet together.

    view more: next ›