Btw what are the realistic chances the guy suffers some actual consequences for the bullshit he has done?
Do they put catalan as endangered?
Probably not. The image does not really say what languages the points represent.
Promotional poster by Mirko Ilić for the 1978 Yugoslavian conference "DRUG-ca žena – novi pristup ženskom pitanju" ("Comrade-ess woman - a new approach to the female question").
Bro is also the artist, ackshually ☝️🤓
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulay
Their pieces were collaborative.
Your point is that you're vaguely concerned about something but won't provide realistic alternatives.
I wondered as well. Apparently, it's a painting by some Russian artist who liked to paint cats and Pushkin for no clear reason: https://a-i-z.livejournal.com/112407.html
Russia is much bigger than Ukraine. You might succeed in wrestling someone to the ground in a one on one fight, much less likely (to say the least) if you're up against two or three people. Ukraine is far from a position where they can pick and choose the nicer methods to win the war.
That's news to me, thank you.
The thing that pisses me off is the fact that they demonstratively did move away from Twitter, acknowledging its usage as problematic, but now have changed their mind and provided a dumb non-explanation. Either way they've taken a dump on their own decision-making.
That's a search engine (like Google Search and DuckDuckGo), not a browser (like Google Chrome and Firefox).
Ah, the heaviest artillery of art criticism: food comparisons.
Google (and/or the libraries that collaborate with Google Books) and Archive.org usually scan non-destructively. Some of Google's book scans still show the fingers holding the corners of the pages, some of them were taken mistakenly mid-flip, etc. So they clearly used whole, normally bound books.
I mean, yes, that's true.
