[–] 3 points 3 years ago

I love outline as much as the next guy, but calling it simple to selfhost is a bit of a stretch. It has lots of moving parts and not having an auth solution built-in makes it not suitable for the average user.

That said, it does beat other wiki solutions by a wide margin!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'll play the devil's advocate here.

    Since bitwarden is a VC funded company, I'm wary of the enshittification that might take place in the future. Even though technically speaking, you can self-host the server via Vaultwarden, it is largely possible because the project has blessing of official devs. That can change dramatically in future.

    For something as important as your passwords, trusting a for-profit company might not be the best idea.

    Would love to know what the community thinks about this.

    DISCLAIMER: I love Bitwarden and use it daily, both for personal use and at work.

  • source