[–] -5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

Lol, nice strawman you built there. There's no need to "wait your turn for justice". Just get yourself a group who enjoys that kind of campaign and you're good to go! This isn't a "We can't fight for gay rights right now. They just blew up the twin towers" scenario.

In fact, you're arguing exactly like the people on the opposite side: "How dare you care about gay rights. We need thoughts and prayers for the 9/11 victims right now and everyone who doesn't focus entirely on thoughts and prayers is a terrorist supporter!" That's your argument right there!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    That's an interesting point you make and I partly agree. There are certain undertones and sometimes you can create a better story by engaging these undertones and creating a monster in noble clothing and a metaphor for the societal corset women are forced ro wear.

    But other times I just want to enjoy a trash movie or 15$ airport library book. And the undertones there are purely accidental and shouldn't be taken too seriously.

    Both forms of entertainment serve their purpose and you can insist on pointing out the political statements and societal undertones in a cheap slasher movie. but that doesn't make you smart or enlightened. It just makes you an ass who enjoys shitting on other people's lighthearted entertainment.

    And one last note: "'fact from fiction' is irrelevant here". No, it's not. If someone accuses me of encouraging mindless slaughter of people based on some mindless dungeon crawling, then it does matter. Because that's exactly the idiotic killer games argument of the early 2000s that has been disproved 100s of times! Killing goblins in a ttrpg has absolutely nothing to do with any moral standpoints I hold outside of the game and only an idiot would believe otherwise!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago

    My language choice is not phobic, it's aggressive, because I'm once again realizing, why half of this sub is permanently looking for groups.

    I can assure you, that there is no inclusivity issue in any of my worlds. But it's also not anything I pay any mind to at all unless my players are looking for connections or love interests. Other than that I try to avoid heteronormativity for the very few occasions NPCs are actually in a relationship that matters to the game and that's it.

    And as I commented before, if you want a world and story FOCUSED on inclusivity and LQBTQ issues, then I'm sure there are countless DMs who will be happy to provide that. Because I am not. My games focus on adventuring, nature and mystic, long forgotten places and that's exactly how I and my players like it!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    Oh, quite the opposite. Most people around me are awesome. And I've gotten pretty good at sorting out the few who aren't. In fact, after deleting Reddit, pretty much my entire dipshit intake stems from Lemmy. I sometimes really do wonder what I'm still doing here. Because clearly, this entire community has some serious issues to work through.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    As I wrote in my original post, some people just have a narcissistic need for self-promotion. They will preach to the choir and bring irrelevant political topics into the game because they feel like the real world doesn't appreciate their valiant efforts towards weaponized inclusivity enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -5 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    No, I'm not. Because my mental development moved past three years old and I'm able to differentiate reality from fiction. Do you also believe that Super Mario players advocate for animal cruelty towards turtles?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Fuck period accurate. It just looks like cheap plastic shit! There's nothing wrong with deliberate deviations as long as they're well made. This is not one of those cases. This is more in line with Rings of Power or the Nilfgard fish armor. An obvious attempt to save money by using crappy props!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    Nah, they've long fallen to the usual cycle of "here is a species of interesting antagonistic creatures" -> "Oh wow, that sounds interesting. I want to play them" -> "Yeah sure, here's a playbale variant of that species. We've removed all traces of evilness and uniqueness because god forbid players playing evil characters". Same as Drow, Orcs, Fairies and Goliath.

    It's not just their inherent evil nature BTW. It's also stuff like daylight sensitivity.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -8 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Or, you know. We could just ignore those pseudo-moral excuses and do some good old goblin slaying because they're in the dungeon, laying traps and we want the loot. Not everything needs 12 layers of logical depth. Sure, it's fun to explore moral implications from time to time, but more often than not, no one cares.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -10 points 6 months ago* (13 children)

    That may be the case for some people, but a lot of people just want some good lighthearted fun without any of the real world implications attached to it. This obviously doesn't excuse bigoted mindsets. I'm talking about campaigns where me and my players just want to do some good old goblin slaying without the need for anyone to chime in with a "UM actshually those goblins have families too".

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Das wichtigste in Kürze:

    • Er hatte definitiv ein Messer dabei
    • Es hat ein Angriff auf Polizeibeamte mit Reizgas stattgefunden
    • Das Messer wurde bei dem Angriff nicht verwendet
    • Der "gute Junge" hat mehrere laufende Verfahren unter anderem wegen Körperverletzung und Raub

    Also ich wäre dann mal bereit, Rassismus als Tatmotiv auszuschließen.

    view more: next ›