has Mozilla considered spending their limited resources working on their web browser

I had to discontinue Linux builds of my game on Steam because the game engine I'm using has a very buggy and unfinished Linux runtime. I'm not happy about it because I wanted native support, but ironically proton is a better user expertise

A small handful of my burned CDs from 20 years ago are unbearable and as far as I can tell, none of my pressed CDs are. I'm sure they'll rot eventually but I think your average cd is quite robust. Still, there's no excuse not to have backups!

I think the top500 is harmful to the hpc community because it encourages people to build huge, mostly homogenous hpc facilities instead of a network of smaller, heterogenous hpc facilities

I can't recommend emby because their business practices are pretty scummy. After accepting open source contributions for years, they went closed-source in 2018 and took all those contributions with them (they had a CLA). The very next update, they added hardware acceleration and locked it behind a paywall. They had a pretty big 'security incident' a few years ago, which probably would have been averted if they were still open source, as users in the community flagged it as an issue long before the devs took action.

Every day from 2021-2025. The UX is already great I just found it very unstable and buggy

When Gnome 3 first came out, it was comically unusable, but now a lot of the big issues have been fixed and I find it only mildly idiosyncratic. I like the KDE user experience more but I also think KDE is much buggier. I switched to gnome last year after getting tired of dealing with my desktop freezing/crashing and it's been pretty smooth sailing. My main complaints are:

• Switching applications instead of windows on alt-tab (has any computer user ever wanted this?)
• Modal dialogues have window decorations that inexplicably move the parent window when dragged
• Typing in Files starts searching instead of navigating to a file/directory with the typed name
• Opening an archive extracts it automatically instead of looking inside

The default gnome applications are also quite inferior to their KDE counterparts (Dolphin is leagues ahead of Files, Kate is much better than Gnome's text editor). But I guess you could install dolphin on gnome if you really wanted, so I won't hold that against the DE itself.

My former boss at an engineering firm had to do an MBA to climb the ladder. He said the secret to success was just to stop thinking rationally

I learned this from a teaching company course named 'Living the French Revolution and the Age of Napoleon'

The French revolutionary government had moderate and radical factions that coexisted peacefully for many years. The terror wasn't something that happened arbitrarily, it was an escalating conflict between radicals and (mostly) counter-revolutionaries acting in the interests the French burgeroise. During the course of the revolution, the government abolished an extremely oppressive system of feudalism, established universal rights for French citizens, established voting rights that would eventually lead to universal suffrage in France, and abolished slavery in the French colonies. That's not to say it was all good (terror, wars, economic hardship, etc) but it completely transformed the entire country in a matter of years, from feudalism to a limited form of democracy, which resembles our modern democratic states much more closely than the system that had been created during the American Revolution.

If your take on the French Revolution is 'they didn't have a common enemy so they turned on eachother' then I would say that it's you who doesn't know their history very well.

Rocm is the singular worst piece of software I've ever used

I had to use Google to work out how to crop to a rectangular selection on affinity 2. Not sure about affinity 3. I was also really unhappy with the 'personas' UI pattern which locks away different photo editing tools into whole parallel universe user interfaces. As a new user it just looked like those features were missing and I had to Google again. It's not hard to learn but my first impression of the software was googling to work out how to do things that are obvious in any other image editor. Maybe it's better in affinity 3?