The cause of war in Ukraine isn't (widely) disputed or controversial, outside of extreme circles. Unfortunately human-caused climate change being the driver for extreme weather is.

'So we should stop giving them meals for free?'

-- Our 'Labour' Government, probably.

Does it matter? They've already paid. I'd rather people who aren't into the movie left, than were disruptive.

I disagree. We're all accepting that the modern world exists primarily online, but instead of preparing our children for the online world, we build a walled garden with no access, until the age of 16 where they get unlimited, uninformed access.

The only solution to this problem is parents teaching and directing their children. The state cannot and should not be involved

I heard there is some football going on, not an expert tho

It also depends when you submit them though, if you only submit them in 2 months they can't tell how much was before and after the change, so will assume it is all after. This is even if they aren't estimating your readings.

Before Brexit the chosen enemy was Polish people/generic eastern Europeans. They are ostensibly white, but many conflicts were over the number of them that were coming to the UK to work, despite that they were mostly doing jobs with high demand like cleaners.

It's only since Brexit that non-European immigration has skyrocketed, as well as the onset of the small-boats issue, since we can no longer send them back to France.

Don't re-write history.

I think the idea is to pay these people to deduplicate and verify vulnerability reports, so the responsibility doesn't fall on every maintainer to do that same process individually, so they can focus on fixing the real bugs.

If you ever see someone ask a lawyer how they can represent a murder defendant, this is why.

I love that nobody watched anything on Yahoo! Screen except for that one season of Community

Interesting, could be a move away from typewise, do you support their gestures? Left to delete and up for capitalised.

Like, you might have someone working on something in a new codebase but misunderstanding the architecture or just going in the wrong direction in general and a review is the best way to correct course before getting too far in

I think the article is suggesting this person should be pair programmed with until they understand the architecture and can be trusted to contribute correctly, and I actually kind of agree - it always feels terrible to tell someone a PR they've worked on possibly for days is completely the wrong direction, and arguably this is already 'too far in' if they're going to need to essentially start again.

Intervening earlier in the process should lead to less wasted effort overall, but people often seem to treat pair programming like its two people at 50% efficiency, when it actually saves a lot of cycle time on reviewing code.