[–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Welcome new admins, I can't get my brain to be friendly right now (not related to you or any of this at all), so I'll just leave it at I'm glad it isn't anyone I have blocked, and good luck.

I'm in a really bad headspace right now due to irl bullshit, so I've not got around to and honestly don't have the brain bandwidth to make my own post about this right now or even discuss it in any depth (nor to fully process what you've suggested in op), but this seems like an opportunity to bring it up if not as a general discussion, then at least for the admins of this specific instance to read and consider, I think it's really important and something I've seen (and personally experienced) get people who are organisers and run communities to end up acting against their own community members and make the latter feel excluded and even unsafe, so I'm just going to leave this here.

The essays are titled "tyranny of civility", they are a bit long, but yeah, I think really important especially on this instance where we (should) take abolishing oppressive structures, even within our selves, seriously:

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

E: There is also Social Power and the Oppressive Potential of Civility which is a later discussion by the same author about the series of essays, and their observations since to, in their words "hopefully highlight some issues that I believe are created by maintaining civility as an unquestioned social norm in a society where institutionalized and social oppression operates along a variety of dimensions." as a kind of TL;DR (though still read the essays if you can)

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    As to why, sure it’s patriarchy, but they keep putting out duds and using it essentially say “audiences don’t want female-led content”…

    You've answered you're own question - they put it out there so they can say they tried, people didn't like it, so we'll continue as we were, with them (patriarchal entertainment execs and the patriarchal capitalists who fund them) maintaining their positions.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    Patriarchy.

    Privilege and with it an overinflated sense of entitlement, which result in the most fragile of egos (E: see downvote ration lmao).

    That's at best.

    At worst, and on top of the above, is conscious and deliberate misogyny and the unwillingness to give the privileges up.

    This is the teeny-tiniest tip of the iceberg, but it sounds like you are willing to challenge your views and perceptions, so jump in, it (E: patriarchy, misogyny, feminism, intersectionality, and on and on..) is a terrifying, but also extremely well documented rabbit hole, just start looking..

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It's both, and you need to zoom out and see the big picture, the one where they coexist because one necessitates the other, to really appreciate the problem

    (ID: aerial photos from South Africa and India showing the vast disparity between rich and poor existing directly next to each other)

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yup, it's a trap.

    There is no way the cops haven't considered this, just like there's no way they will stop ICE when they inevitably turn up.

    Even if we theoretically pretend that the cops mean well (they don't) - they are prioritising being the "good guys" and patting themselves on the back over the safety of the people they're using as props to that end.

    If you want to help save people form immigration raids you hide them, you don't draw them out in big groups, especially not to a violently racist government agency.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    ID: A drawing of a roller skating frog framed in a white bubble on a yellow background, they have on a pink hat with yellow horns coming out of either side and pink roller skates, they're smiling and holding up a drink with a straw, their bare butt facing the viewer, it has a little pink heart on it. There is vertical bubble text to the left that says "fuck em" and there are little stars all around.

    Credit: Sugar & Sloth

     

    ID: photo of someone holding up a cushion in a double-sided sequin cover where the sequins are a different colour or pattern depending on what direction they are laying.

    Here the background sequins are blue, and a pattern has been brushed in the opposite direction in the shape of a slug's head complete with optical tentacles (eyes at the ends of antennae), to reveal Nicolas Cage's eyes and mouth perfectly fitting in to give the slug a face.

     

    ID: Xtremely Transbian, Online @ThisACoolPerson posted:

    "i imagine being a liberal is much like having a cat on your lap, in that you have a comforting distraction from misery and can't stand up for anything"


    E: before people derail the conversation to offer me the fallen arm from the title - I've tried many different combinations, and they all result in a wrong looking shruggy face. Deal with it lol

    view more: next ›