Technically no. Congress passed the AUMF which let the President go after anyone they deemed complicit in 9/11. It did not declare war against specific nations iirc.
Why would they need a "sign of innocence"?
Shut the fuck up
I didn't describe any passages. Arguing with someone who doesn't believe in tangible reality is a waste of time. Thank you for the conversation.
Then it should be condemned and called out for the hate and bigotry that it represents. Lol. Not a hard concept.
Except that piece of art isn't guiding millions of people's beliefs. What a dumb statement.
Yes. Not educating is the way to go. That always works out well!
Maybe you should skip these threads in the future. Don't you think it's important for people to understand this concept? Not everyone knows everything. Educate.
Not too smart, are ya?