[–] 1 point 3 days ago* (1 child)

The Treasury could have bought up mortgage notes instead, at pennies on the dollar, and started collecting interest on the debt just like the private banks had. Then they could have renegotiated mortgages of underwater homes at lower interest rates, while the private sector lenders filed for bankruptcy. That would have drastically reduced the foreclosure rate and dumped the material cost of the financial crisis on stock and bond holders of these private companies.

I'm curious how this action would have changed the last 20 years of politics? Those in power during that time did a shit job of really explaining why the banks got the money and not the homeowner. I think this really exposed who the federal politicians were representing, and it wasn't the everyday voters. I think that anger and sense of betrayal that the American people were told to "kick rocks." while the actual criminals got a bailout of our money still sits in with of most of the population.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago*

    It's just a new/different version of the tired trope that the black kid in the hoodie is dangerous- BE SCARED OF THE BLACK KID IN THE HOODIE !!!!!

    Yet it is almost always the white man in the suit that is going to either rob you or kill you.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago*

    The insider trading thing got explained by Mike Johnson -

    Since members of Congess only make 174,000 / year they need to insider trade stocks to make enough money...

    Because being a politician isn't seen as a public duty anymore but a full time career

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    or maybe between 0 and 1. that way it would be easier to see if the topic that I've decided is super interesting and won't shut up about is interesting to the to the other person as well. If I start seeing the number dropping quickly, time to change topics or just walk away.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago*

    when you hit about 45, your mental age is currentAge-20 years-ish but doing an activity associated with mental age can come with some surprising consequences, mostly unhappy surprises at that. But as you continue to age you start accepting who are and start making less stupid choices that are associated with how you mentally feel.

  • source
  •  

    How did this western societal idea of how a man should act, and what emotions are appropriate to show come about? How far back in western history does this idea of limiting men’s ability to emote honestly go? And how did these ideas change over time?

    It’s interesting to me because I feel like these traditional and limited roles that western society puts on men (and women) are just that traditions. That it’s just something “that we do because past generations did them.” So my curiosity is why did past generations have these societal rules in place? was there a legitimate reason for it, did having men be almost robotic even in the privacy of his home and around his family have some necessary and important reason? If so is that still necessary today?

    Edit: had this posted on c/asklemmy but it was suggested this was a better place for this question.

     

    One study by the First Street Foundation, a research firm that studies climate threats to housing, found that roughly 3.2 million Americans have already migrated, many over short distances, out of flood zones, such as low-lying parts of Staten Island, Miami and Galveston, Texas. Over the next 30 years, 7.5 million more are projected to leave those perennially flooded zones, according to the study.

    All of this suggests a possible boom for inland and Northern cities. But it also will leave behind large swaths of coastal and other vulnerable land where seniors and the poor are very likely to disproportionately remain.

     

    Covering large parking lots with solar panels is an idea that goes back decades but in America at least it's an idea that has never really taken off.

    What is the reason for that? Is it due to the overall cost or is there something else that keeps Walmart, Target, Costco, Sams Club, Malls, etc. from covering their parking lots with these panels and selling the power?

    view more: next ›