Problem for me is that YouTube is my main source of video entertainment. I like being a part of the reason creators can get paid.
Sure I hate giving google money, but if everyone does adblock and no one donates to creators, then there will be no quality content.
Many creators i watch probably has a patreon or similar, but I watch so many different ones that yeah, yt premium is the easiest way for me to support while being ad free.
This is a response to both you and the person you're responding to:
As much as I despise AI for creative use, I'm just not convinced by these observations. Both could be artistic / stylistic choices. Guess that argument could be used for a lot of "AI" observations though.
Disclosure: I know nothing about this movie, but the crop circle perspective seems to align with the bottom of the image also being a bit skewed, sort of a fish eye distortion. The "lens flare" just seems artistic to me and looks a little like an "eye" effect. These could be relevant thematic choices of the movie.
What are the signs that it is? I can't really tell honestly.
Emotional intelligence to me, means that someone understands their feelings, why they have them and where they come from. They know how to 'treat' themselves.
Some people are better than others at this. Some might get really frustrated but not understand why, while others can perfectly describe why they are frustrated, what they need to resolve it and then act on it. This to me is a very real thing.
EDIT: Oh and it also goes the other way. Someone who is emotionally intelligent might also be good at infering others emotions. Doesn't just apply to one self. I suppose this is called empathy.
Dit slutspørgsmål fangede mig lige.
Umiddelbart kan jeg forstille mig, at en løsning ville være en form for et mundtligt "forsvar" af en given skrevet opgave. Man skal altså kunne redegør for den viden, man præsentere i sin opgave. Her tænker jeg at man som lærer/eksaminator, hurtigt kan danne sig et overblik over den reelle forståelse eleven måtte have omkring emnet.
Jeg kan da selv huske fra min tid på gymnasiet, at mundtlige opgaver var langt sværere at trække gode karakterer i, hvis man ikke havde en god forståelse af stoffet. Jo man har en mulighed for at trække lidt op hvis man har talegaver, men en god lærer/censor lader sig ikke narre af charme.
Men dette er bare ikke en reel løsning... Det tror jeg simpelthen ikke der er ressourcer til. Så hvad filen gør man!
Speaking as someone who struggles with mental health: I found that having the mindset of not apologizing unless you directly spoke bad or wrong about someone, is a good guideline for not 'overthinking'. Sometimes I am too quick to apologize, which honestly makes my apologies meaningless IMO. This is a rough guide and not a clear cut thing of course. But having these shortcut "guidelines" helps me mentally.
You went out of your way to open a discussion about something you thought had meaning, I mostly lurk and enjoy posts like yours, so thank you for contributing. Know that you help add value to my life, stranger.
I mean, this is not a finely curated magazine, its a public speaking ground. I get that sometimes we might accidentally misrepresent or unwillingly forget details - which is what it is, it's about the intent. It's fine that someone "calls you out" for maybe not making the best post about a given topic, that lacks clarification. This way we can fight misinformation and misunderstanding.
I'm writing this on a break at work so its mostly a mind dump, do with it as you please. My point is that I fear a lot of people, including myself, get too caught up in self censorship in the hope of not being wrong or misinforming others. Which sure is a noble thought - but it might stifle otherwise meaningful discussion before they ever get a chance to materialize. I'd much rather see a few misrepresented things here and there, especially if it's not mission critical to my life like this post, than having to constantly be afraid to share.
My traumatized ass now has an urge to apologize for writing such a long reply to a seemingly small little exchange here on the internet, but you know what? You're probably still reading because you were somewhat engaged positively, negatively or because you skipped to the end. But it was your choice.
Again, mind dump.
De fleste børn i Afrika har det også bare passe fedt, fordi deres forældre kan give dem alt de har brug for...
Jeg kan ikke lade værre at have tanken, der siger:
Hvis nu alle betalte deres andel i skat, og vi fik nedlagt den store ulighed - ville det så ikke også frigive flere midler som man kunne bruge, til at støtte nye virksomheder? Eller er jeg for naiv.
Det er også samme tanke jeg har haft omkring dette. Men hvilke konsekvenser der ville være til følge, har jeg ikke sat mig ind i.
Med alt det der foregår i USA og generelt i den kapitalistiske verden, kan jeg kun se det som positivt at de skrider, hvis de ikke ville bidrage til fælles kassen.
Man, I've always had negative opinions on "conspiracy theory" nuts, who are a bit too skeptical about everything... but these days... I feel I might be becoming one.
It's either that - or I am becoming aware of how messed up the world is. So maybe I'm not paranoid, but just painfully aware of "the system."
Ignorance truly is bliss. It's stressful to always have thoughts like the one you're presenting.
