[–] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

You don't get to tell me what I mean when I speak. Regimes, revolutions, and states are all different things and I would never use one of those terms to mean another. There's no point in arguing with people lacking even the most basic understanding of politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    No. That's not what happened. I rejected the idea that having a violent revolution makes a regime violent by definition. This whole time I've been talking about regimes and you've been talking about revolutions. It's really that simple of a miscommunication.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Who cares? I'm not talking about how they get solidified. I'm talking about what they do when they have power. If someone supports violent left wing regimes, then they are a Tankie. If you don't think that the regimes are violent beyond their revolutions, then that wouldn't imply one way or another whether you are a Tankie.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    The symptoms you describe are caused by bad prompting. If an AI is providing over-complicated solutions, 9 times out of 10 it's because you didn't constrain your problem enough. If it's referencing tools that don't exist, then you either haven't specified which tools are acceptable or you haven't provided the context required for it to find the tools. You may also be wanting too much out of AI. You can't expect it to do everything for you. You still have to do almost all the thinking and engineering if you want a quality project - the AI is just there to write the code. Sure, you can use an AI to help you learn how to be a better engineer, but AIs typically don't make good high-level decisions. Treat AI like an intern, not like a principal engineer.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›