From my research, it doesn't seem like that method is harmful to humans, at least not more than not eating fruits.
It could become a reason eventually
feel like we're going to be waiting for 2-5 years at least..
He was convicted a long time before that, so yes
by KDE i meant Fedora KDE. Thought it would be obvious since the graph is labelled that way, i guess not.
I feel bad for the people on the developing team who had no idea this may be used for surveillance
I guess competing is correct, but I don't see it overtaking steamOS any time soon or even coming close since the steamdeck is an actual product marketed by a for-profit company.
I feel like it may not overtake KDE, from the graphs the trend seems to somewhat be following there too recently. Like a bump in number of downloads because of popularity, but not a linear trend. Does that even make sense?
yes I understand, but I was just mentioning that the process is convoluted for everyone involved. people tend to forget the troubles of devs and maintainers.
In addition to demanding payment of a registration fee and agreement to their (non-negotiable and ever-changing) terms and conditions, Google will also require the uploading of personally identifying documents, including government ID, by the authors of the software, as well as enumerating all the unique “application identifiers” for every app that is to be distributed by the registered developer.
The F-Droid project cannot require that developers register their apps through Google, but at the same time, we cannot “take over” the application identifiers for the open-source apps we distribute, as that would effectively seize exclusive distribution rights to those applications.
(implying that even non-play store apps needs Devs to give their info to google)
source: https://f-droid.org/en/2025/09/29/google-developer-registration-decree.html
granted, this is a secondary source, but it does link the primary source within the quoted text.
Convoluted process where the developer of the app has to sell their soul to Google
This is actually eye-opening. One problem I have is: the sponsors of LF basically own Linux and control it? Linus doesn't have any of his own personal opinions on top of that?
If that's really true, then what is even the point of having a 'Linux Foundation'? Because I'm like 99% sure Linux as a whole won't ever have a lack of sponsors.