Holy shit it's Rob Beckett! I couldn't recognize him at first without seeing the teeth.
Yeeeeeah.... I'm gonna need you to pair this outfit with a coffee mug and post it to one of the gone wild coffee subs. Thanks Jilanico, good seein' ya.
Well I had a big lunch, my insulin pump couldn't keep up.
I worked at the Overstock home office back in the day. Patrick Byrne was nuts long before he hitched his wagon to Trump, and did way too many drugs in the office.
I need to correct myself. The messages would be admissible either way having nothing to do with hearsay. The messages are direct, documented evidence on their phones. As you pointed out the statements made (or not made) in the car, absent video, audio, or a third party, could only have been available from the 2 parties statements and therefore needed both parties to be available in court to be entered.
No. Hearsay is when person A claims person B made a statement when person B is not available in court to be cross examined. The messages were admitted as evidence and were a main point in the defenses' argument. They were admissible because the messages were between the 2 parties to the lawsuit, therefore both were available to be questioned.
"Ward consistently maintained that the encounter was "wholly consensual". His defense highlighted that the two exchanged friendly messages afterward and that the woman gave no indication she wanted to leave the vehicle during their interaction."
WE'RE NUMBER ONE! WE'RE NUMBER ONE!
That different show is more Star Trek than several Star Trek shows.
Post this to one of the 3d printing subs and wait.
I blame low blood sugar.